On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:23:08PM -, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> As you suggested I created a bunch of transitional packages. That
> required that the Conficts fields in the corresponding hunspell-*
> packages and the hyphen-no package were replaced with Breaks/Replaces. I
> agree it's not nec
Thanks for your comments, Mattia.
I have considered it further, and created a new PPA, this time with lo-
dicts 1:5.1.0-1:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/lo-dicts4
This time I made use of the nifty debian/helper.py, and to start with I
made the version change which you already m
So, I applied a version of the first point in git (with a different
version that is not invented), that should be enough.
For the second one: I'm not sure I like adding that in debian at all. It
shouldn't be necessary anyway (also considering that my evil plan includes
pushing for the removals
Hmm.. Time goes by, and lo-dicts 1:5.1.0-1 seems to be stuck in Debian's
new queue for some reason. One possibility is that we simply upload in
Ubuntu with a debian/control delta for now, to make reasonably updated
dictionaries available in 16.04. However, it would still be good if we
could agree o
On 2016-02-10 16:34, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Well, lo-dicts builds a binary hunspell-sv containing both dictionaries.
Aha, great, missed that. Then all is well, I think.
> the source hunspell-sv instead builds 2 binaries hunspell-sv-se and
> myspell-sv-se. They probably conflicts, but one doesn'
Well, lo-dicts builds a binary hunspell-sv containing both dictionaries.
the source hunspell-sv instead builds 2 binaries hunspell-sv-se and
myspell-sv-se. They probably conflicts, but one doesn't take the other
over automatically, no.
I'd be lovely see this done before xenial… Björn??
--
You r
I don't think that hunspell-sv-se is a blocker for syncing from Debian.
Currently there are two versions of hunspell-sv-se in the Ubuntu
archive: The latest is built by libreoffice-dictionaries, but there is
also an old one built by the hunspell-sv source package. If we would
sync, both would be o
I'd love to see Björn Michaelsen do the initial merge (because I don't
think a sync is possible). After that I'll happily take care of the
subsequent uploads, but I don't have enough time to dedicate to the
first, big one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Please, sync the latest with Debian and merge the changes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510198
Title:
Rebase/Reimplement Ubuntu changes upon Debian (possibly upstream them)
To man
** Tags added: xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510198
Title:
Rebase/Reimplement Ubuntu changes upon Debian (possibly upstream them)
To manage notifications about this bug go t
are there any news on this?
would be nice to have this done for xenial, so we can drop conflicts and stuff
right after it, instead of keeping them for 2 more years.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
** Changed in: libreoffice-dictionaries (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510198
Title:
Rebase/Reimplement Ubuntu changes upon Debian (possibly
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 07:52:11PM -, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
> I just looked if we can do a direct sync, but stopped when I found that
> Debian wasnt building hunspell-sv-se. I wouldnt merge if there is not
> more to it, rather just readd those on top of Debian package ..
debian's lo-dicts bu
I just looked if we can do a direct sync, but stopped when I found that
Debian wasnt building hunspell-sv-se. I wouldnt merge if there is not
more to it, rather just readd those on top of Debian package ..
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
are there ubuntu changes that make sense to keep at all?
I see the most relevant delta is the bunch of .dictlistinfo installed in
$(CURDIR)/debian/$$pkg/usr/share/myspell/infos/ooo/$$pkg
that ttbomk are not used anymore nowadays.
as stated on #268953 I wanted to give a shoot at this now that x
** Tags added: upgrade-software-version
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510198
Title:
Rebase/Reimplement Ubuntu changes upon Debian (possibly upstream them)
To manage notifications a
16 matches
Mail list logo
