This bug was fixed in the package dpdk - 2.2.0-0ubuntu1
---
dpdk (2.2.0-0ubuntu1) xenial; urgency=low
* Merge from Upstream to DPDK 2.2
Remaining changes:
- Set soabi for the combined shared library
* Drop changes:
- configuring RTE_LIBNAME to dpdk as it is the upstrea
WoW! That's amazing! Thank you for this amazing Christmas gift! :-D
Happy holidays for you and your family Christian!
Cheers!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521289
Title:
DPDK wi
Hi Thiago,
if you want to experiment with it, there is a - yet unstable - preview of DPDK
2.2 with xen pmd enabled at
https://launchpad.net/~paelzer/+archive/ubuntu/dpdk-merge-2.2/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
WOW! This is awesome! Thank you so much for your effort Christian! I really
appreciate it...
Ubuntu is so cool!
You guys, Ubuntu developers, are very close with users via Launchpad...
:-D
On 17 December 2015 at 13:24, ChristianEhrhardt <1521...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> Hi Thiago,
> good ne
Hi Thiago,
good news.
I wanted to let you know that the following fixes that went into the release of
DPDK 2.2:
- 539ed5f8 mk: fix combined library build with Xen driver (my patch)
- f17230e1 xenvirt: fix build for 32-bit platform (thanks to Huawei Xie for
that one)
together seem to be sufficien
The fix for "CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIBS + LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT" that went
upstream was mine :-)
I didn't retry the 32bit buld since then, but I did not see a fix for that
on the list yet.
Christian Ehrhardt
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Thiago
Sounds awesome Christian!
Listen, is this [DPDK with Xen on 32-bit] still a BUG with DPDK
2.2.0-rc3?
The combo "CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIBS + LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT" is now
fixed! At least, it compiles...=)
Cheers!
Thiago
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Hi Thiago,
Yes as of now it seems that the 32bit build issue is the only issue
blocking me currently to enable XEN_PMD in the build.
If you could get a fix to that to upstream to DPDK I think I can pick it up
and use it to enable XEN_PMD in the next version of the package.
In the worst case it migh
Hi Christian,
Nice talk on DPDK Dev mail list about combined libs! I hope to see
everything Ubuntu need, on upstream DPDK 2.2...
Listen, is the Xen on 32-bit the only remaining DPDK problem to close
this BUG?
About DOM0, I understand that it needs DKMS and, from what I'm seeing,
only XENVIRT
I reported the build issue at dpdk-dev =>
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-December/029261.html
I'm not really willing to carry any super-special "only build it in
amd64" delta just for that.
Waiting on your (Thiago) and upstream responses to decide how to
proceed.
--
You received this bug
Building on i386 instead of amd64 reveal issues in the XEN_PMD code that might
force me to drop the enablement.
I'll have a look if it is simple.
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
Hi,
I was able to identify the underlying issue of the build problem with
LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT & COMBINE_LIBS.
There is a much simpler fix than what was suggested to you for this specific
issue.
I submitted it to dpdk-dev =>
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-December/029246.html
Since it is a
Hi Thiago,
thanks for splitting up the discussion.
We are not entirely sure yet on how to manage (combined) library versions (so
is the DPDK project overall).
And in that regard we will see if we can just "take the patch" or need to find
a different solution.
I'm working on 2.2 now and once tha
13 matches
Mail list logo
