** Description changed:
- llvmt-toolchain-3.7 FTBFS on i386 on both Wily and Xenial. See
- https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-
- discuss/2015-December/015993.html. I'm filing this to help those
- following that thread to track this.
+ [Impact]
+
+ * People can't use llvm on i386
+
+
no, it doesn't.
xenial already have 3.7.1.
I'm pushing it in a few minutes/hours, and then in wily as SRU
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527865
Title:
llvm-toolchain-3.7 FTBFS on i3
LLVM 3.71 relased
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-announce/2016-January/66.html
Does it help? Available from upstream?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527865
Title:
FTBFS o
@Timo, while I agree about llvm-3.8 for xenial, I don't see any good
reason for not having an llvm-3.7 on i386 too, specially because the fix
(the last one) should be good and trivial.
happy new year :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
Well that sounds good.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527865
Title:
FTBFS on i386
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolch
We've discussed what the default llvm version for 16.04 will be, and
settled on 3.8. Once (at least) RC1 is available mesa will switch to it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527865
Titl
Upstream bug here
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25921
I don't remember how to link it
** Bug watch added: LLVM #25921
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25921
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
@Robie, how do you feel about the other debdiff?
@Jarkko disabling LLDB doesn't require to wait for 3.8,
LLVM 3.8.0 Release Schedule:
16 January 2016: Branch, prepare RC1.
27 January: RC2: critical bugfixes only.
18 February: Tag final release.
Soon thereafter: Release LLVM 3.8.0.
Any idea when this 3.8 comes then? Also if you have a bug report at
upstream for this issue. Please share. It's not for everyone to build
their own mesa packages.
I just downloaded saint row 4 (published yesterday for Linux via steam).
And it requires opengl 4.1.
It's not just ubuntu that needs t
Any idea when this 3.8 comes then? Also if you have a bug report at
upstream for this issue. Please share. It's not for everyone to build
their own mesa packages.
I just downloaded saint row 4 (published yesterday for Linux via steam).
And it requires opengl 4.1.
It's not just ubuntu that needs t
I tried llvm-toolchain-snapshot (aka upcoming 3.8) and i386 is fixed
https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/costamagnagianfranco-ppa/+build/8745236
so I think unless upstream provides us a way to cherry-pick a fix we can
just drop LLDB and wait for 3.8 to come out
--
You rec
what about this debdiff?
I disabled completely lldb for i386, and I'll try to ask upstream to backport
something.
(3.8 should be out before xenial freeze, I hope to have it in xenial)
** Attachment added: "debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-3.7/+bug/1527865/+at
I don't see disabling the tests as a good solution. trunk currently builds, so
apparently something was fixed and is missing from the 3.7 branch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527865
Thank you for the debdiff! This looks good to me and I'd be happy to
sponsor it, but I'd just like to give Matthias an opportunity to comment
first in case it's the wrong thing to do. I've subscribed him to this
bug. If Matthias hasn't objected after a while ping me and I'll sponsor.
17:15 Locutu
@Robie, the problem seems more on the buildd system instead of llvm
itself, because I see the build killed after 150 minutes of inactivity.
Could you please sponsor the following debdiff? It just disables the
LLDB testsuite for i386 (it is already disabled for some arm*
architectures).
you can s
@Alberto
I'm an Ubuntu Core Developer. I'm confident that "FTBFS on i386 on Wily
and Xenial" is enough for any Ubuntu developer to understand what the
bug is about. The external link is only for context in understanding bug
impact, not the bug itself.
To be more specific for future reference to s
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: llvm-toolchain-3.7 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527865
Please:
1. Edit this bug so it is clear for anyone what is it about without the need to
visit an external link.
2. Set this bug status back to "confirmed".
Thank you.
** Changed in: llvm-toolchain-3.7 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification becaus
** Changed in: llvm-toolchain-3.7 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527865
Title:
FTBFS on i386
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
19 matches
Mail list logo