** Changed in: thumbnailer (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528406
Title:
image provider test fails in CI train for arm64 (Vivid only)
To ma
Doko, can you comment?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528406
Title:
image provider test fails in CI train for arm64 (Vivid only)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
Thanks for that, will do!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528406
Title:
image provider test fails in CI train for arm64 (Vivid only)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
I'd ask Matthias Klose he does gcc stuff so would be my first person to
ask for more pointers
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528406
Title:
image provider test fails in CI train for a
Presumably, yes. All I know is that the arm64 build works on xenial, but
fails on vivid. Strangely, the function pointer syntax works for us
everywhere, except in this one test.
The work-around is good enough for us for now. But, seeing the the work-
around is rather non-obvious, it would be good
Looks like the old "using function pointers in signal/slot connections
doesn't work because the linker is broken" bug we had on regular armhf
and got fixed at some point
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
If it's vivid only then it probable means the xenial toolchain is
already fixed up?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528406
Title:
image provider test fails in CI train for arm64 (Vivi
I worked around the problem by changing this:
QSignalSpy spy(response, &QQuickImageResponse::finished);
to that:
QSignalSpy spy(response, SIGNAL(finished()));
Seeing this happens only on arm64 on Vivid and passes everywhere else,
I'd say this is a Qt problem of some kind?
** Also affects: qt-s
** Changed in: thumbnailer (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528406
Title:
image provider test fails in CI train for arm64 (Vivid only)
To man
