** Changed in: qtmir
Assignee: Lukáš Tinkl (lukas-kde) => Nick Dedekind (nick-dedekind)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535397
Title:
[enhancement] Implement support for QWindow:
** Tags added: lt-blocker
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535397
Title:
[enhancement] Implement support for QWindow::visibility set to
Automatic
To manage notifications about this
mir (0.19.0+16.04.20160128-0ubuntu1) xenial; urgency=medium
** Changed in: mir
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: mir (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
** Branch linked: lp:~fboucault/camera-app/fullscreen_staged_only
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535397
Title:
[enhancement] Implement support for QWindow::visibility set to
Automa
** Branch linked: lp:~renatofilho/mediaplayer-app/pocket-pc-full-screen
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535397
Title:
[enhancement] Implement support for QWindow::visibility set to
** Branch linked: lp:~artmello/gallery-app/gallery-app-
convergence_fullscreen
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535397
Title:
[enhancement] Implement support for QWindow::visibility se
** Changed in: camera-app (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: camera-app (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: camera-app (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Florian Boucault (fboucault)
** Changed in: gallery-app (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided =>
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: unity8 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Lukáš Tinkl (lukas-kde) => Nick Dedekind (nick-dedekind)
** Changed in: qtubuntu (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Lukáš Tinkl (lukas-kde) => Nick Dedekind (nick-dedekind)
** C
Fix committed into lp:mir at revision None, scheduled for release in
mir, milestone 0.20.0
** Changed in: mir
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535397
** Branch linked: lp:~alan-griffiths/mir/add-
mir_surface_spec_set_shell_chrome
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535397
Title:
[enhancement] Implement support for QWindow::visibility s
My concerns are threefold:
1. there is no good name for this feature: "automatic" doesn't capture specific
behaviour;
2. I don't understand why this specific use case needs any special support; and,
3. what advantage is expected from Mir being involved?
As discussed above:
Clients can implement
As a note to Chris's comment #9:
While what is being asked for is state associated with a surface, it
isn't a distinct "surface state".
If modelled as surface state it requires at least new two states
mir_surface_state_automatic_restored and
mir_surface_state_automatic_fullscreen (and possibly
mi
As an addendum to Alan's comment: we *have* shell-determined surface
state; all surface state requests can be arbitrarily modified by the
shell.
The use-case being asked for is a “support for surface state that is
fullscreen on the phone but windowed on the desktop”; which is available
to clients
To clarify, the desired behaviour /can/ be implemented client-side with
the existing Mir API. This would require implementation code in each
toolkit (or client). The limitation of this approach being that the
shell isn't required to respect set_state() requests issued by the
client.
We /can/ also
** Branch linked: lp:~lukas-kde/qtmir/automaticVisibility
** Branch linked: lp:~lukas-kde/unity8/automaticVisibility
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535397
Title:
[enhancement] Imple
** Changed in: qtmir
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: qtmir
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukáš Tinkl (lukas-kde)
** Changed in: unity8 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
I disagree with calling this a "Qt-specific API", since this is rather
Ubuntu-specific behaviour, oblivious of the toolkit. Qt might be the
default toolkit we're using, but clients using other toolkits (or none
at all) should be able to make use of this behaviour as well.
I can rename the bug to "
I remain unconvinced that this needs anything to be implemented in Mir
at all.
This appears to be a Qt-specific API that can be implemented entirely in
the client-side QPA - the QPA needs to know whether the client wants
automatic state anyway, knows the form-factor the surface is on,
receives eve
Having discussed this a few times I've reached the following conclusion:
"automatic" is not a MirSurfaceState - if it were a MirSurfaceState,
then it would be correct to return it from get_state() and for it to be
implemented as "looking the same as fullscreen or restored".
By comparison, "restor
** Summary changed:
- Implement support for QWindow::visibility set to Automatic
+ [enhancement] Implement support for QWindow::visibility set to Automatic
** Tags added: enhancement
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
20 matches
Mail list logo
