[Bug 1536872] Re: [MIR] limba

2016-02-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Meh... I suppose splitting the plugin out and putting it into universe is not possible, since you need to build-depend on Limba... An alternative is to rebuild that part and possibly other plugins in universe, which would essentially mean two GNOME Software copies in the archive, which is also a

[Bug 1536872] Re: [MIR] limba

2016-02-09 Thread Tyler Hicks
** Changed in: limba (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536872 Title: [MIR] limba To manage notifications

[Bug 1536872] Re: [MIR] limba

2016-02-09 Thread Robert Ancell
We've decided to ship GNOME Software with limba disabled. ** Changed in: limba (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536872 Title: [MIR] limba To

[Bug 1536872] Re: [MIR] limba

2016-02-03 Thread Robert Ancell
Agreed we can patch out backends if we want. It comes down to the cost of having limba in main versus the packaging diff. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536872 Title: [MIR] limba To

[Bug 1536872] Re: [MIR] limba

2016-02-03 Thread Michael Terry
There's a system daemon as well as a setuid binary, so I'm going to put this onto security for a quick look first. Robert, as for breaking gnome-software into modules, I get why Debian doesn't want to. But Ubuntu can separately patch out or in support for backends to offer one . I imagine we'll

[Bug 1536872] Re: [MIR] limba

2016-01-26 Thread Robert Ancell
** Tags added: gnome-software-ubuntu ** Description changed: [Availability] In Universe [Rationale] Required for GNOME Software (MIR in bug 1536870). [Security] [Quality assurance] + No open bugs in Debian or Ubuntu. [Dependencies] + All in main [Standards complianc

[Bug 1536872] Re: [MIR] limba

2016-01-25 Thread Robert Ancell
Discussed with Matthias Klump (ximion) about if it made sense to split the plugins out of the gnome-software binary package: ximion, Do you have any plans to split the gnome-software package into subpackages for plugins? Asking mostly because it seems a waste of time to put limba into main rob

[Bug 1536872] Re: [MIR] limba

2016-01-21 Thread Robert Ancell
** Description changed: [Availability] In Universe [Rationale] - Required for GNOME Software (MIR in bug 1536870). + Required for GNOME Software (MIR in bug 1536870). May not be required if we make the Limba plugin a separate package in Universe. [Security] [Quality assurance]