** Changed in: luajit (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544649
Title:
Luajit on ppc64el
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
** Tags removed: severity-medium targetmilestone-inin1710
** Tags added: severity-low targetmilestone-inin1804
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544649
Title:
Luajit on ppc64el
To mana
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin1704
** Tags added: bugnameltc-136949 severity-medium targetmilestone-inin1710
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544649
Title:
Luajit on ppc64el
To
** Tags removed: bot-comment bugnameltc-136949 severity-medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544649
Title:
Luajit on ppc64el
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://b
I talked to Enrico and Ondřej (Luajit maintainers), and they are going
to move luajit 2.1.0~beta2 to unstable as soon as stretch is released.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544649
Titl
Hi Steve,
Correct, the ppc64el patches in 2.1 does not apply on version 2.0 due to
a missing layer called LJ_GC64.
In fact, luajit version 2.0 only supports 32 bits architectures, and has
an exception for amd64, that is heavily based on the MAP_32BIT mmap
flag. The MAP_32BIT flag is only support
The ppc64el patch in luajit 2.1.0~beta2+dfsg-3 in Debian experimental
does not apply cleanly to luajit 2.0.4+dfsg-1. Is the debdiff in
https://bugs.debian.org/814255 still applicable, and is it complete?
I notice that the patch from https://bugs.debian.org/814255 touches some
code that would be c
Debian included ppc64el support on luajit version 2.1.0~beta2+dfsg-3. It
is still on experimental archive right now.
Is it possible to cherry pick the ppc64el patch from this version?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin1610
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin1704
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544649
Title:
Luajit on ppc64el
To manage notifications about this b
** Changed in: luajit (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544649
Title:
Luajit on ppc64el
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bug
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #814255
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814255
** Also affects: luajit (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814255
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because yo
** Package changed: ubuntu => luajit (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: luajit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in: luajit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: luajit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Taco Screen team (taco-screen-team) => (unassigned)
--
You received this
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin1604
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin1610
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544649
Title:
Luajit on ppc64el
To manage notifications about this b
It is not out of the question for Ubuntu to take these patches in
advance of Debian and/or upstream, but at the moment I don't believe
we're able to commit to delivering such a fix for this Ubuntu universe
package in the 16.04 release.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
15 matches
Mail list logo
