[Bug 1549300] Re: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in option file

2016-06-30 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin--- ** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin1610 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549300 Title: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) fo

[Bug 1549300] Re: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in option file

2016-06-22 Thread Guo, Liang Chang
As expected, dialog gets fully recovered in the recent Ubuntu 16.10 (Yakkety Yak) Daily Build root@ubt1610:~# dpkg -l dialog ||/ Name Version Architecture Description +++----== ii

[Bug 1549300] Re: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in option file

2016-06-20 Thread Guo, Liang Chang
Checking the latest note in the changelog, this bug might have been fixed recently: http://invisible-island.net/dialog/CHANGES.html#t20121230 2016/04/24 + fix a special case in drawing shadow on a line-drawing cell where the alternate-character set flag was lost (report by Martin

[Bug 1549300] Re: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in option file

2016-06-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From lc...@us.ibm.com 2016-06-17 12:59 EDT--- A new defect was opened against dialog under the platform Fedora 23: https://bugzilla.linux.ibm.com/show_bug.cgi?id=142786 - dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in option file Now is the time to

[Bug 1549300] Re: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in option file

2016-06-16 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From lc...@us.ibm.com 2016-06-16 20:48 EDT--- The bad package dialog-1.2-16.20150528.fc23.ppc64 had arrived in Fedora 23, and soon will go into Red Hat, CentOS ... everywhere. It is ruining the configuration UI of our PMLinux application, and must be fixed as soon as possible

[Bug 1549300] Re: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in option file

2016-04-15 Thread Guo, Liang Chang
Unfortunately, the same bug now occurs on Fedora 24, with: dialog-1.3-3.20160209.fc24.ppc64le (Build Date : Fri 19 Feb 2016 11:26:24 PM CST), from the latest build: http://mirrors.rit.edu/fedora/fedora-secondary/releases/test/24_Alpha/Server/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-ppc64le-24_Alpha-1.3.iso

[Bug 1549300] Re: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in option file

2016-04-09 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: dialog (Ubuntu) Assignee: Taco Screen team (taco-screen-team) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: dialog (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: dialog (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 1549300] Re: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in option file

2016-03-24 Thread Guo, Liang Chang
Whiptail is too simple. It even has no form input box, so there's no way for it to be an alternative for dialog that is popular with non-Ubuntu Linux systems. It's weird that the Ubuntu team pays more attention to whiptail than to dialog. -- You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Bug 1549300] Re: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in option file

2016-03-24 Thread Steve Langasek
This package is in the Ubuntu archive, available for installation on Ubuntu server installs, etc. However, it is only in the Ubuntu main archive as a dependency of the desktop product; it is not a component that we support as part of the server product. What you have described is certainly a real

[Bug 1549300] Re: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in option file

2016-03-24 Thread Guo, Liang Chang
What are you talking about? There is no point that dialog is not supported on Ubuntu ppc64el server! In fact, dialog package is available by default in apt archive repository: http://us.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports, in the same main URL as dash's: http://us.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/pool/mai

[Bug 1549300] Re: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in option file

2016-03-24 Thread Michael Hohnbaum
dialog is a desktop package and not supported on ppc64el -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549300 Title: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in opt

[Bug 1549300] Re: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in option file

2016-02-24 Thread Guo, Liang Chang
** Package changed: ubuntu => dialog (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549300 Title: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in option file T

[Bug 1549300] Re: dialog wrongly requires double backslashes (\\n, \\Z) for control codes in option file

2016-02-24 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source packages so that people