[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2017-04-02 Thread Edward Vielmetti
Are there before and after numbers for ThunderX that are easy to share? I'm seeing aes-128-gcm 78608.06k 167039.08k 239836.84k 268366.17k 277192.70k with "OpenSSL 1.0.2g 1 Mar 2016" on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS aarch64 with "1.0 .2g-1ubuntu4.6", which almost certainly is a "with this patch"

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-04-22 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: openssl (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552939 Title: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be To

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-09 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package openssl - 1.0.2g-1ubuntu2 --- openssl (1.0.2g-1ubuntu2) xenial; urgency=medium * debian/patches/arm64-aarch64_asm.patch: Enable aarch64 asm routines (LP: #1552939). -- dann frazier Mon, 07 Mar 2016 10:03:26 -0700 **

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-08 Thread Yangzheng Bai
Verified the new xenial-proposed openssl and libssl debs, both AES and SHA performance have been significantly improved. We tested the following packages from xenial-proposed on arm64 (aarch64 with fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32) and the performance result is as expected:

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-07 Thread dann frazier
fyi, this is now available in xenial-proposed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552939 Title: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be To manage

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-07 Thread dann frazier
This is a change to a Debian-specific targets, so marking it Invalid for the upstream OpenSSL project. ** Changed in: openssl Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-07 Thread Christian Reis
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552939 Title: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-04 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: openssl (Debian) Status: Unknown => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552939 Title: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be To

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-04 Thread Ali
Hi Dann, Yes, that is expected. The Xgene doesn't have support for hardware crypto instructions. I believe it's the only AArch64 platform without them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-04 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552939 Title: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-04 Thread dann frazier
Oops - I mean thanks Yangzheng! Confused the bug reporter w/ the patch submitter, sorry! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552939 Title: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-04 Thread dann frazier
Thanks for the patch Ali! I uploaded a test package to ppa:dannf/test, and I've attempted to reproduce the improvement on a couple of different systems. On a ThunderX system, I am observing a significant performance improvement. However, on an X-Gene system, the performance actually seems to be

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-04 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Also affects: openssl (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794326 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown **

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552939 Title:

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-03 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment "debian-arm64-aarch64_asm.patch" seems to be a patch. If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers, unsubscribe the team. [This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-03 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: openssl Status: Unknown => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552939 Title: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be To manage

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-03 Thread Yangzheng Bai
** Tags added: arm64 patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552939 Title: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-03 Thread Yangzheng Bai
** Patch added: "debian-arm64-aarch64_asm.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssl/+bug/1552939/+attachment/4587974/+files/debian-arm64-aarch64_asm.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

2016-03-03 Thread Yangzheng Bai
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #794326 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794326 ** Also affects: openssl via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794326 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags added: xenial -- You received this bug