[Bug 1556685] Re: Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17)

2016-06-10 Thread Graham Inggs
** Description changed: + [Impact] + Users building their own projects using OpenCASCADE Community Edition (OCE) and installing the development libraries liboce-*-dev and oce-draw will be surprised to find .cmake files in (e.g.) /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/oce-0.16 instead of /usr/lib/x86_64-linu

[Bug 1556685] Re: Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17)

2016-06-09 Thread Graham Inggs
Sorry pitti, I missed your question as I wasn't automatically subscribed to this bug. As far as I can determine, this change is cosmetic. The files that get installed into lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/oce-0.17 are mostly .cmake files that end up in the liboce-*-dev packages. Except for the files th

[Bug 1556685] Re: Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17)

2016-06-08 Thread Steve Langasek
rejected from queue while waiting for test case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556685 Title: Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17) To manage notifications about this bug g

[Bug 1556685] Re: Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17)

2016-05-31 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: oce (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556685 Title: Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17) To manage n

[Bug 1556685] Re: Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17)

2016-05-24 Thread Martin Pitt
Can you please write a test case that demonstrates the observable effect on reverse dependencies? The changed installation path can certainly be observed, but that's not proof that the proposed one is actually "correct" in the sense of "works for consumers of oce". Thanks! -- You received this bu

[Bug 1556685] Re: Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17)

2016-05-23 Thread Graham Inggs
** Changed in: oce (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556685 Title: Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17) To manage no

[Bug 1556685] Re: Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17)

2016-05-17 Thread Graham Inggs
** Changed in: oce (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Also affects: oce (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: oce (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1556685] Re: Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17)

2016-05-11 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: oce (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556685 Title: Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17) To manage notifications ab

[Bug 1556685] Re: Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17)

2016-05-09 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: oce (Debian) Status: Unknown => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556685 Title: Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17) To manage notifications about t

[Bug 1556685] Re: Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17)

2016-05-09 Thread Graham Inggs
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #823839 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823839 ** Also affects: oce (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823839 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you a