@dino99: remember, what we are testing here is transitioning from a
working wine1.6 installation to the Debian wine package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558480
Title:
Make Wine pa
New test:
1) first purge gnome-disk-utility, then reinstall it
2) install wine64 : that time no error/warning
3) try to run a 32 bits apply (terminal.exe from Metaquotes Metatrader 4), but
get again some conflicts:
oem@u64:~/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/FxPro - MetaTrader 4$ wine terminal.exe
it
@dino99: I have gnome-disk-utility installed, and it was not removed
during the procedure above.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558480
Title:
Make Wine packages synced from Debian
T
Feedback 1.8.3-3
Wants to remove gnome-disk-utility when trying to install wine64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558480
Title:
Make Wine packages synced from Debian
To manage notif
I've just run another test of upgrading from wine1.6 on yakkety amd64 system to
the latest packages from jre's PPA. Below is what it looks like.
We plan to upload jre's wine1.6 package along with wine 1.8.4 to yakkety in
about one week, so please test and report back in this bug.
$ sudo add-ap
For the record: the cups patch will be in the upcoming 1.8.4, so it's
only needed for a short time.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558480
Title:
Make Wine packages synced from Debian
Great, Graham! That worked.
So now everybody may test the transition from src:wine1.6 to src:wine
in:
https://launchpad.net/~jre-
phoenix/+archive/ubuntu/transition+wine1.6+wine/
CAVEAT: I messed up the Ubuntu versioning in there
(1.8.3-3+local50+Ubuntu.src.wine), so there won't be an automatic
Attached is a patch for wine 1.8.3 to fix the FTBFS with the new version of
cups.
It is already included in the wine-development branch.
** Patch added: "wine-cups.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1558480/+attachment/4722607/+files/wine-cups.patch
--
You receiv
After sleeping a bit, I realized that the additional native package
src:wine1.6-transition is not needed at all for the transition to
src:wine. Instead I now just added the binary package "wine" to
src:wine, next to the renamed binary package "wine-stable".
So the new updated state in https://laun
I've now got two solutions (tested in Debian with rebuilt Ubuntu
packages) for an upgrade path from src:wine1.6 (1:1.6.2-0ubuntu15) to
either the Debian packages src:wine (1.8.3-3) or src:wine-development
(1.9.16-1). After a transition (until including the next 18.04) the
Debian packages might theo
@bryanquigley
>>(At least in the long run) you should add "1:" to every versioned
>>breaks/replaces in d/control.in.
>I'm not sure what that means exactly. I haven't added any "versioned"
breaks/replaces just using the 1.6 in the package name.
If you add the epoch ("1:") to the version in d/chan
@jre
Thanks for the feedback!
1.) Breaks/Replaces:
>Test all packages (e.g. wineNN-tools, libwine-dev, wineNN-preloader). The
>-tools may be installed without "wine" itself, so you shouldn't rely on
>breaks/replaces in wine/wineNN itself.
I'm going through testing now. Yes, the breaks/replaces
I had hoped that in "" there is some clue what's wrong on your
system, that's why I asked for unshortened. Not sure what's "gnome3
staging packages", I don't know that. But I guess some Gnome staging PPA
has the potential to conflict with a Wine PPA. Someone more into Ubuntu
might help there, a
@jre
sudo apt install wine32=1:1.8.3-2ubuntu3 libwine:i386=1:1.8.3-2ubuntu3
The following packages have unmet dependencies.
libwine:i386 : Depends: libldap-2.4-2:i386 (>= 2.4.7) but it is not going to
be installed
Depends: libpulse0:i386 (>= 0.99.1) but it is not going to
> "sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386" seems doing nothing.
@9d9: i386 is enabled on your system, otherwise you'd get another
message from the new wine packages.
Generally you always need to issue a "sudo apt update" afterwards (you
don't mention that anywhere in your recent bugs). However your ap
> - There are valid use cases for installing only 64-bit wine.
Could you give some examples? 64 bit windows apps generally require the
32 bit subsystem as it's always available on Windows.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
Well, i've glanced at win64 installation from winehq wikis and else
But Yakkety seems having a real problem to upload the i386 arch:
"sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386" seems doing nothing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
@Bryan
from #28 request:
oem@u64:~$ sudo dpkg -l libwine:i386
dpkg-query: no packages found matching libwine:i386
oem@u64:~$ sudo apt-cache showpkg libwine:i386
Package: libwine:i386
Versions:
1:1.8.3-2ubuntu3
(/var/lib/apt/lists/ppa.launchpad.net_bryanquigley_wine-sync-testing_ubuntu_dists_
Great, bryanquigley! You might get in contact with ginggs who's also
working on this.
1.) Breaks/Replaces:
Test all packages (e.g. wineNN-tools, libwine-dev, wineNN-preloader). The
-tools may be installed without "wine" itself, so you shouldn't rely on
breaks/replaces in wine/wineNN itself.
(At
@dino99, thanks for testing. that is odd, it seems that wine -> wine32 or
wine64, and then wine64 only recommends wine32
Can you pastebin or attach the output of dpkg -l and apt-cache showpkg
libwine:i386 ? Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
I also noticed that installing:
fonts-horai-umefont fonts-unfonts-core libfreetype6:i386 libpng16-16:i386
really helps make more apps work. Will investigate further tomorrow.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
As a reminder, Wine absolutely requires the 32 bit subsystem even on 64
bit systems running 64 bit Windows apps, so if that dependency isn't
absolute then something is broken with the packaging ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
@Bryan
installed your ppa and then installed wine64 on a yakkety 64 system:
- the installation is fine
- the wineconfig file is missing; but the autoconfig script is ran when
terminal.exe is hitted
- but then wine fails with:
oem@u64:~/.wine/drive_c/Program Files86/FxPro - MetaTrader 4$ wine ter
Been working on this a bit, the Debian package is quite close to just being
able to be synced, I had to change:
* Add breaks/replaces to fonts-wineVERSION specifying wine1.6
* Add breaks/replaces to libwineVERSION specifying
wine1.6,wine1.6-amd64,wine1.6-i386
* Add breaks/replaces to wine64VE
Ubuntu 16.10 and Wine 2.0 will be released this year but Ubuntu will
still be using wine 1.6 FOREVER
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558480
Title:
Make Wine packages synced from Debia
Any news?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558480
Title:
Make Wine packages synced from Debian
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/
I suppose that the desktop integration is on the patches in ubuntu's
"wine1.6". Do they apply into debian's "wine"?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558480
Title:
Make Wine packages sy
I'm not speaking with any authority, but I *really* like the approach,
and I really like packages being in sync between Debian and Ubuntu :)
thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15584
I meant I'll add to d/rules:
export VENDOR=$(shell dpkg-vendor --query Vendor && dpkg-parsechangelog -S
Version)
and replace in version-string.patch (which applies to a Makefile)
"Debian" with "$(VENDOR)".
Then "wine --version" should give something like these examples:
wine-1.8.2 (Debian 1.8.2-
I don't think dpkg-parsechangelog is actually making differences,
because syncd packages have the same changelog as the debian packaging.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558480
Title:
@LocutusOfBorg
Nevermind, I'll change it do display vendor and the Debian version
(dpkg-parsechangelog).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558480
Title:
Make Wine packages synced from
@LocutusOfBorg: Thanks! After writing my comment I wondered about
automating this, but didn't know what to call.
version-string.patch is mainly intended to make upstream's life easier
if bugreports are filed directly with them. It gives you this:
$ wine --version
wine-1.8.2 (Debian)
What is Ubun
@jre-phoenix
what about changing that patch version-string to some code in rules file?
ifneq ($(shell dpkg-vendor --derives-from ubuntu && echo true),true)
(debian)
else
(ubuntu and derivatives)
endif
this would allow us to sync the package, instead of having such delta
(that BTW I would
** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #819255
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819255
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558480
Title:
Make Wine packages synced fro
I don't really know the Ubuntu packages, so what I offer is mainly to
help explaining what Debian does in its wine packages. Whatever ...
1.)
I assume the wineprefixes, notably the default prefix in $HOME/.wine, would
just continue to work. Since the WoW64 changes I made in January there
shouldn
I'm jre from Debian's pkg-wine.
It would be great if Ubuntu based its wine packages on Debian.
If you've got any questions or need help, please just ask. I'd be happy to work
on this closely together.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
Please also see:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/winetricks/+bug/1574681
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558480
Title:
Make Wine packages synced from Debian
To manage notif
no, just syncing is wrong. you have to care about the upgrade too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558480
Title:
Make Wine packages synced from Debian
To manage notifications about t
In reality we only need the latest stable Wine version in Ubuntu, as
nearly all applications supported in previous releases are well
supported in later ones.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
@ Mathew Hodson
I am setting this report to "high" because this is not only bringing
more features, but also allowing the package to be upgraded properly in
the various Ubuntu releases.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
We just need to make sure there are no important integration problems
with the various desktop environments.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558480
Title:
Make Wine packages synced fr
Also this is a special case where having a stable release upgrade for
Xenial will serve better software stability than staying with the old
Wine package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
42 matches
Mail list logo
