[Bug 1569724] Re: noatime option

2021-08-23 Thread Jonathan
Just use the parse the date from the snapshot name as Martin mentions. I'm going to uninstall this plugin as it has made my system unusable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569724

[Bug 1569724] Re: noatime option

2020-10-29 Thread Dark Dragon
As mentioned in the linked thread, I still don't get why we need to know when a snapshot was booted last. The only thing I am interested in, was when it was created. I create my snapshots read-only. So when I want to _use_ a snapshot more than just booting once, I need to create a rw subvolume (as

[Bug 1569724] Re: noatime option

2020-10-29 Thread Jürgen Hörmann
In Bug #833980 Michael Vogt writes: > I added some code into trunk now that will detect noatime and simply bail out for now. We need a more clever way of detecting the snapshots age in this case. The code must ensure that it detects when a snapshot was booted last, not when it was taken. Maybe

[Bug 1569724] Re: noatime option

2020-10-29 Thread Jürgen Hörmann
** Branch linked: lp:~darkdragon-001/apt-btrfs-snapshot/trunk -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569724 Title: noatime option To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1569724] Re: noatime option

2020-10-29 Thread Jürgen Hörmann
Hello Michael, I Subscribed you to this issue because you are the maintainer of the package as stated here: https://www.ubuntuupdates.org/package/core/groovy/universe/base/apt- btrfs-snapshot as @darkdragon-001 stated he created a PR for this that does not rely on atime but on the filestamp in

[Bug 1569724] Re: noatime option

2020-10-23 Thread Halvor Lyche Strandvoll
Is this getting any attention at all? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569724 Title: noatime option To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1569724] Re: noatime option

2020-09-14 Thread Halvor Lyche Strandvoll
Please do fix this, this is long overdue :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569724 Title: noatime option To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1569724] Re: noatime option

2020-08-29 Thread Dark Dragon
I fixed this almost three years ago: https://github.com/darkdragon-001 /apt-btrfs-snapshot/commit/83f6f9d9ca2557b7f0225a7d3fbffd107cd207c4 But merge requests are just ignored: https://code.launchpad.net/apt- btrfs-snapshot/+activereviews I am just using my own version since a couple of years:

[Bug 1569724] Re: noatime option

2020-06-26 Thread Martin
This bug is still open in Kubuntu 20.04! A solution for people using SSD (I think today it's the vast majority) and therefore using "noatime" is still missing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1569724] Re: noatime option

2019-04-11 Thread Martin
In Bug #833980 Dark Dragon writes: "I think it is better to parse the snapshot name, since it includes the creation time anyway. Feel free to review my changes" Sounds like a good solution to me, but seems to be still not implemented yet. I'm using Kubuntu 18.10 with a btrfs root partition. If I

[Bug 1569724] Re: noatime option

2017-04-18 Thread Alex Malinovich
To further illustrate how ridiculous this is, I've updated /etc/cron.weekly/apt-btrfs-snapshot to make a backup of fstab, remove all occurrences of noatime, run apt-btrfs-snapshot delete-older-than, and then move the original fstab back into place. I understand that there are legitimate concerns

[Bug 1569724] Re: noatime option

2016-07-18 Thread Gilles Schintgen
I've stumbled upon the same issue. Here's what I found: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-btrfs- snapshot/+question/263994 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-btrfs-snapshot/+bug/833980 In my opinion "older than" should NOT imply "last accessed/used". Such a feature

[Bug 1569724] Re: noatime option

2016-07-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: apt-btrfs-snapshot (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569724