Fixed with zyga updated snap-confine.
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580018
Title:
ubuntu-core image missing a
** Changed in: snap-confine
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580018
Title:
ubuntu-core image missing awk
To manage notifications about thi
** Changed in: snap-confine
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580018
Title:
ubuntu-core image missing awk
To manage notifications about this bug go t
** Changed in: snap-confine
Milestone: None => 1.0.34
** Changed in: snap-confine
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580018
Title:
ubuntu
sure, but thats an extra hack we need to maintain and it might not work
with all packages (there are some that change the binary name via the
alternative or point to some non-bin path for an executable, not to
forget that many packages also use it for config files in random
places).
so this requir
Can't we nuke alternatives in core? In what situation is it useful to
still have that in the core image?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580018
Title:
ubuntu-core image missing awk
T
By "nuke the alternatives" I mean, as part of the image build process,
iterate over the alternatives and just point the symlink to the
alternative, instead of to /etc/alternatives/whatever.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
well, only the individual ones i guess, if you mount the whole dir over
the host one you might hide bits you dont want to hide ...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580018
Title:
ubuntu
** Also affects: snap-confine
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: snap-confine
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: snap-confine
Assignee: (unassigned) => Zygmunt Krynicki (zyga)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
Hmm, so shall we bind-mount the core-snap /etc/alternatives over the
already bind-mounted /etc from classic?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580018
Title:
ubuntu-core image missing aw
This just bit the nextcloud snap as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580018
Title:
ubuntu-core image missing awk
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launc
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580018
Title:
ub
I'm discussing the changes to ubuntu-core-launcher that would hide
/etc/alternatives from the classic system when snaps are running.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580018
Title:
ubun
It's because /etc isn't hidden; the snap sees the host's /etc.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580018
Title:
ubuntu-core image missing awk
To manage notifications about this bug go t
This is odd-- the os snap I use specifies mawk as the alternative, but
yours has gawk.
$ snap list
NameVersion Developer
...
ubuntu-core 16.04+20160419.20-55 canonical
$ ls -l /etc/alternatives/awk
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 20 04:58 /etc/alternativ
Thanks Jamie. My ubuntu-core was out of date, but updating doesn't
change the symlinks which my snap'd app sees:
michael@dev-xenial2:~/dev/todo.txt⟫ snap list
Name Version Developer
hello-world 6.0 canonical
todo 2.1
ubuntu-core 16.04.0-24 canonical
michael
In 16.04+20160420.05-01:
$ ls -l /usr/bin/awk
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Apr 20 04:58 /usr/bin/awk -> /etc/alternatives/awk
$ ls -l /etc/alternatives/awk
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 20 04:58 /etc/alternatives/awk -> /usr/bin/mawk
After running 'snap refresh ubuntu-core' and getting 16.04+2016041
** Description changed:
- I'm trying to snap a tool which uses awk. I checked the default apparmor
- profile for any snap, and it seems to indicate that awk is installed and
- enabled by the profile, but when checking (via a test snap),
- /usr/bin/awk symlinks to /etc/alternatives/awk symlinks to
18 matches
Mail list logo
