This bug was fixed in the package virtualbox - 5.0.24-dfsg-
0ubuntu1.16.04.1
---
virtualbox (5.0.24-dfsg-0ubuntu1.16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Update to the latest minor release for xenial (LP: #1594493)
-- Gianfranco Costamagna Tue, 05 Jul 2016
10:17:21 +0200
** Changed i
This bug was fixed in the package virtualbox-ext-pack -
5.0.24-0ubuntu1.16.04.1
---
virtualbox-ext-pack (5.0.24-0ubuntu1.16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Update to the latest minor release for xenial (LP: #1594493)
-- Gianfranco Costamagna Tue, 05 Jul 2016
10:15:15 +0200
--
Y
This bug was fixed in the package virtualbox-guest-additions-iso -
5.0.24-0ubuntu1.16.04.1
---
virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (5.0.24-0ubuntu1.16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Update to the latest minor release for xenial (LP: #1594493)
-- Gianfranco Costamagna Tue, 05 Jul 2016
After using it a bit more, I vote migrating it to stable.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594493
Title:
Extension Pack incompatiblity
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
ht
Martin,
I am testing as well and I am not seeing any issues at the moment. I
will be running this for a bit just ensure no negative functionality.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159449
just tested, so far so good.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594493
Title:
Extension Pack incompatiblity
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun
** Description changed:
+ [ test case ]
+ Updating virtualbox and download the latest ext pack from upstream should
stop give the useless warning to the user, and also installing
virtualbox-ext-pack will stop it
+
VirtualBox provides an VM VirtualBox Extension Pack for VirtualBox 5.0.
This
Please add a test case to the description so that this can actually be
verified.
** Also affects: virtualbox (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: vi
I like the SRU idea, uploaded on xenial unapproved queue.
** Also affects: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: virtualbox (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Also affects: virtualbox-ext-pack (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecide
I don't know what is SRU, but 'mouse pointer offset' regression in
guest-dkms (https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/15324) ruins GUI usability
in linux guests and is worth to be fixed before the release of 16.04.1.
Please read the comments on that ticket from the post #5 , as the bug
appears not only
some comments:
1) 5.0.22 ext pack should work correctly in virtualbox 5.0.18
2) there is a virtualbox-ext-pack that downloads and installs for you the
correct version
3) I'm fully aware of the fixes in later virtualbox releases, but I don't think
they are worth an SRU, and I could understand if y
11 matches
Mail list logo
