[Bug 1600318] Re: Adudacious depends on both GTK and Qt

2016-07-14 Thread Julien Lavergne
Thanks John for the comment. I tested a workaround to disable the Qt build, trying to do the less intrusive changes to the packaging (the real change should be done by Debian). The debdiff is included. I'll upload it if there is no objection on it. ** Patch added:

[Bug 1600318] Re: Adudacious depends on both GTK and Qt

2016-07-09 Thread John Lindgren
Upstream here. I would recommend distributing only the GTK+ interface at this point since the Qt interface is still missing important features. If you do want to distribute the Qt interface, it would be better to do it in an alternative package (e.g. audacious-qt). Having both interfaces

[Bug 1600318] Re: Adudacious depends on both GTK and Qt

2016-07-08 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: audacious (Debian) Status: Unknown => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1600318 Title: Adudacious depends on both GTK and Qt To manage notifications about

[Bug 1600318] Re: Adudacious depends on both GTK and Qt

2016-07-08 Thread Brendan Perrine
** Changed in: audacious (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1600318 Title: Adudacious depends on both GTK and Qt To manage notifications about