This was fixed in several steps with the last one landing in 0.99. The
issue should be fixed now.
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification
Since this requires more investigation I'm going to unsubscribe the
ubuntu-sponsors team.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1606600
Title:
dpkg-reconfigure unattended-upgrades results in
More investigation is needed. The path *does* fix the problem, but in a
way that feels like it is a side effect.
Sorry, I should have commented on this bug before.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
You removed your upstream pull request, do you think this still needs
sponsoring?
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
The attachment "debdiff for xenial" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-
sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can
review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a
patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the
"patch" tag, and if
I *think* the root of the issue is that the assumption in debian/rules
# we do not want to run the init script in the postinst/prerm, its
# really only useful on shutdown, see Debian bug #645919
dh_installinit $@ --no-start -- stop 10 0 6 .
is wrong.
It is not only usefu
This debdiff should fix the problem.
** Patch added: "debdiff for xenial"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1606600/+attachment/4826417/+files/unattended-debdiff.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You rec
Hello,
I am fighting exactly with the same problem. Is there any workaround?
Thanks
BR
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1606600
Title:
dpkg-reconfigure unattended-upgrades results in up
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1606600
Matthew, note that the change I was trying to make did not take effect.
This might be independent of the warning message, but it's the real
problem being reported. As noted, omitting "-fnoninteractive" enables it
to work, but as I'm trying to do this in a script, that omission is not
a reasonable o
The warning message is because of the following line in debian/rules.
dh_installinit $@ --no-start -- stop 10 0 6 .
It is just warning that the stop action is now ignored. It shouldn't
have any impact. See this announcement.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01109.html
** Summary
12 matches
Mail list logo
