The v2 version of the fix is being worked on here:
https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7436
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607067
Title:
Add a dotfiles / hidden files interface
T
Doh, wrong branch browser tab.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607067
Title:
Add a dotfiles / hidden files interface
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launch
This has been merged already.
** Changed in: snapd
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
This is being worked on in https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5845
** Changed in: snapd
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
There's some further discussion about the topic of this PR here:
https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/access-to-specific-hidden-file-path-in-
users-home/6948/8
Josh, we're are researching about a way to solve problems similar to the
ones you describe. It's still not ready for prime time, but I believe we
> I don't think we will add a generic "this dot file" interface but we
can easily add a dedicated one (for a specific dot file) because this
has measurable security impact and can be appropriately gated.
Even if you disregard text editors, how are you expecting for tools like
Shellcheck[1] to be a
Hello. Sorry for the lag, we have a few bugs and feature requests and
just a handful of hands to make them all fixed. We have added one pair
of interfaces, specifically for ssh keys (public and private) as a pair
of interfaces. I don't think we will add a generic "this dot file"
interface but we ca
This bug is nearly 2 years and and severely limiting the usability of
snap packages. Since I know Canonical is pushing snaps crazy hard, I
would have expected some movement on this sooner. This needs to be a
priority.
You can't expect average desktop users to know how to either install a
snap in
It is pretty common to have hidden (dotted) config files in the user's
home.
+++ I think the home interface should deal with that! +++
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607067
Title:
A
Gustavo, what are your thoughts on this?
** Project changed: snappy => snapd
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607067
Title:
Add a dotfiles / hidden files interface
To manage notifica
** Tags added: isv
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607067
Title:
Add a dotfiles / hidden files interface
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snap
** Changed in: snappy
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607067
Title:
Add a dotfiles / hidden files interface
To manage notifications about this bug go
This would be useful also for codetree as we need to be able to read git
and bazaar credentials that the user may have so it codetree can be used
for non-public code.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
I think it's reasonable to have parameters on the home interface, which
allow us to expand the range of files to which particular snaps have access.
Mark
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
This bug was mentioned in this thread on the list
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snapcraft/2016-August/000854.html
It's not strictly snappy related, but is snap related. It's hard to
write snaps for editors like vim/ emacs etc as these would be expected
to have access to all files in home, even
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607067
Title:
Add
It would seem pointless to have this restriction on "home" if it was
only another interface away to get to those files: as I understand it,
dot files are assumed to contain sensitive information and therefore
excluded, so I can sleep well knowing that nothing would read my .ssh
for example just bec
** Tags added: snapd-interface
** Also affects: snappy
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607067
Title:
Add a dotfiles / hidden files interfa
18 matches
Mail list logo
