This bug was fixed in the package vte2.91 - 0.44.2-1ubuntu3
---
vte2.91 (0.44.2-1ubuntu3) yakkety; urgency=medium
* Add fix-reverse-search.patch:
- Backport commit from 0.44 branch to fix regression in 0.44.0 that broke
reverse search (LP: #1627007)
-- Vlad Orlov
Thanks. Indeed, I keep forgetting about this nuance. Sometimes I submit
patches to Debian as well, and I'm used to running 'dch --nmu' as
described in this tutorial:
https://raphaelhertzog.com/2011/07/04/how-to-prepare-patches-for-debian-
packages/
Also I didn't know there's an auto-closing
Thank you!
I made some changes to your debian/changelog entry. In particular,
Ubuntu does not have NMUs because all Ubuntu packages are collectively
maintained by Ubuntu contributors.
And I added this bug number so that the bug will automatically be closed
when the package arrives in yakkety.
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: vte2.91 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627007
Title:
@Mathew,
i was hoping some cleanup before the yakkety final release: for example
start a gnome-shell session and check the journalctl output. You will
see a bunch a widgets garbage when the terminal is used.
Please backport the required fixes recently published; these logs are
warnings, but give
** Changed in: vte2.91 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627007
Title:
patch - fix reverse search in various terminal apps
To manage
** Changed in: vte
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
** Changed in: vte
Importance: Unknown => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627007
Title:
patch - fix reverse
The attachment "this patch fixes reverse search in terminal apps" seems
to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the
bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff.
If the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the
attachment,
