Launchpad has imported 9 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98260.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633520
Title:
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633520
Title:
I think we can use this one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633520
Title:
Support dbus runtime relocation
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
So mardy, is there a different bug about snapd growing support for dbus
activation or will we use this? (just trying to keep track of it)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633520
Title:
1) Indeed, it wouldn't be as simple as a file copy, it should also
modify the path as you wrote.
2) I think we have the same use-case: unity8. I'm now working on getting
Online Accounts to work inside a unity8 snap, but we might want to move
away from a monolitic approach and deliver some session
Alberto, sure that could work in principle. Good point.
- We'd have to not only copy the .service file, but modify its Exec=
line to point inside the correct snap and update the file when a new
snap version gets installed (or delete it if the new snap doesn't use
the file anymore, etc).
- What
Thanks Jamie, I've added snapd to this bug. Given that it's blocking me,
I happily volunteer to work on it.
Just please confirm that my understanding is correct: it will be a new
interface, whose slot will be implemented in snapd itself, and snaps
willing to use the auto-activation feature will
** Also affects: snapd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633520
Title:
Support dbus runtime relocation
To manage notifications
"Could snapd be so smart to copy the .service file into
/usr/share/dbus/services/ when the interface gets connected, and unlink
it when it gets disconnected?"
Yes it could and that sounds like a reasonable approach if it is
properly designed, but I think that is a different problem than what PR
Hi Micheal, I also just stumbled on this problem. :-)
I wonder if this could be solved in a very different way, which does not
involve any changes to dbus-daemon. I've seen that for bug 1590679 we
are moving to a solution [1] in which the snap providing the D-Bus
service would declare an
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633520
Title:
Support dbus runtime relocation
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
12 matches
Mail list logo
