[Bug 1634763] Re: RM binaries; Demote src to proposed; FTBFS gcc/boost

2016-11-07 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from zesty: libosl 0.6.0-3.3build1 in zesty libosl-dev 0.6.0-3.3build1 in zesty amd64 libosl-dev 0.6.0-3.3build1 in zesty i386 libosl-doc 0.6.0-3.3build1 in zesty amd64 libosl-doc 0.6.0-3.3build1 in zesty

[Bug 1634763] Re: RM binaries; Demote src to proposed; FTBFS gcc/boost

2016-11-07 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from zesty: gpsshogi 0.6.0-3+nmu2build1 in zesty gpsshogi 0.6.0-3+nmu2build1 in zesty amd64 gpsshogi 0.6.0-3+nmu2build1 in zesty i386 gpsshogi-data 0.6.0-3+nmu2build1 in zesty amd64 gpsshogi-data

[Bug 1634763] Re: RM binaries; Demote src to proposed; FTBFS gcc/boost

2016-10-31 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Summary changed: - Demote to proposed; FTBFS gcc/boost; RM + RM binaries; Demote src to proposed; FTBFS gcc/boost ** Description changed: FTBFS with current boost FTBFS with current gcc Upstream appears to be defunct slow RC bugs filed in Debian RM bugs filed in Debian Blocking