[Bug 1641303] Re: Wish: apt shouldn't show kept-back packages within the list of upgradable

2021-08-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
There's some misconception here; held back is a package-level flag. ALinuxUser: Just use pinning instead of holds to achieve that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641303 Title: Wish:

[Bug 1641303] Re: Wish: apt shouldn't show kept-back packages within the list of upgradable

2021-08-11 Thread ALinuxUser
I too would welcome an option whereby apt-get update would wholly ignore 'held' - i.e., held back - packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641303 Title: Wish: apt shouldn't show ke

[Bug 1641303] Re: Wish: apt shouldn't show kept-back packages within the list of upgradable

2021-08-11 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641303 Title: Wish:

[Bug 1641303] Re: Wish: apt shouldn't show kept-back packages within the list of upgradable

2016-11-12 Thread Oleksandr Pikozh
Note (tiny mistake in previous comment): - - 'apt list --kept-back' to show packages on hold (= 'apt-mark showhold'); + - 'apt list --kept-back' to show packages on hold that can be manually upgraded (⊆ 'apt-mark showhold'); (The fact that the package is on hold, per se doesn't necessary mean t

[Bug 1641303] Re: Wish: apt shouldn't show kept-back packages within the list of upgradable

2016-11-12 Thread Oleksandr Pikozh
Note (tiny mistake in previous comment): - - 'apt list --kept-back' to show packages on hold (= 'apt-mark showhold'); + - 'apt list --kept-back' to show packages on hold that can be manually upgraded (⊆ 'apt-mark showhold'); (The fact that the package is on hold, per se doesn't necessary mean tha

[Bug 1641303] Re: Wish: apt shouldn't show kept-back packages within the list of upgradable

2016-11-12 Thread Oleksandr Pikozh
Sorry, it should be 'Thus' (a.k.a 'Therefore') instead of 'This' in the last sentence. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641303 Title: Wish: apt shouldn't show kept-back packages within

[Bug 1641303] Re: Wish: apt shouldn't show kept-back packages within the list of upgradable

2016-11-12 Thread Oleksandr Pikozh
IMHO: 'apt list' should have at least 2 keys: - 'apt list --upgradable' to show packages that will be upgraded; - 'apt list --kept-back' to show packages on hold (= 'apt-mark showhold'); - 'apt list --upgradable --kept-back' to show both (i.e. union). And 'apt update' should report only '--upg

[Bug 1641303] Re: Wish: apt shouldn't show kept-back packages within the list of upgradable

2016-11-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I get you what you say. But there is a distinction between (manually) upgradeable packages and packages that will be upgraded (automatically). I'm not going to decide whether the status is Opinion, Won't Fix, or Triaged, as I'm not entirely sure what we really want to do. -- You received this b