Ok, the yakkety security update is finished so I uploaded 0.1.7 to the
xenial new queue.
** Changed in: bubblewrap (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
** Description changed:
- [SRU Team Note]
-
- This update is waiting on security bug 1657357 to be pushed first.
-
[Impa
Setting to Incomplete while we wait for the yakkety security update.
** Changed in: bubblewrap (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16
** Description changed:
+ [SRU Team Note]
+
+ This update is waiting on security bug 1657357 to be pushed first.
+
[Impact]
I'm writing a snapcraft plugin that uses bubblewrap for sandboxing
purposes, but since bubblewrap isn't available on xenial while snapcraft
is, it's currently bl
Ok, thanks! I don't need it for trusty then.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649330
Title:
[SRU] bubblewrap unavailable on xenial
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
** Description changed:
[Impact]
I'm writing a snapcraft plugin that uses bubblewrap for sandboxing
purposes, but since bubblewrap isn't available on xenial while snapcraft
is, it's currently blocked from landing.
Besides that, bubblewrap is a generally useful tool for running comm
No, it's not more difficult to backport to trusty. It just needs someone
to want it there and be able to verify the SRU. But if you only
currently wanted it for snapcraft, snapcraft is currently xenial and
above. (snapd is trusty and above). Anyway, uploading now to xenial's
new queue.
--
You rec
Thanks for looking at this and the CVE, Jeremy!
Is SRU'ing this back to trusty difficult? The only reason I would want
bubblewrap there is if snapcraft itself is also actively being SRU'd
back to trusty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
Thanks! Uploaded to xenial's new queue.
Do you want this uploaded to trusty also? Flatpak is not easily
backportable to trusty so it's not needed for Flatpak, but since snapd
is now supported on trusty...?
** Description changed:
[Impact]
I'm writing a snapcraft plugin that uses bubblewra
** Changed in: bubblewrap (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: bubblewrap (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: bubblewrap (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: bubblewrap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You
** Also affects: bubblewrap (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649330
Title:
[SRU] bubblewrap unavailable on xenial
To manage
It's a copy of *yakkety*'s archive now...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649330
Title:
[SRU] bubblewrap unavailable on xenial
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://b
I tested it from the PPA here [1], in a Xenial VM. It's just a copy of
what's currently in zesty archive, with an extra changelog entry for the
xenial release. I'd prefer if we could just copy the package in zesty
directly as it doesn't have release info in the changelog.
[1]
https://launchpad.net
12 matches
Mail list logo
