Public bug reported:

Hi,
the Intel KVM module is build as a module, yet OTOH the s390 one is not.
I asked around and we discussed, quoting the core of the discussion that I'd 
like to be continued here:

<xnox> cpaelzer, we want kvm to be available. on x86 there are two modules 
depending on ones cpu features (amd vs intel vs whatever). thus cannot be 
compiled in, as either/or are loaded.
...
<xnox> infinity, the problem on s390x was that unlike on x86 nothing would 
autoload the module
<infinity> xnox: That sounds like a bug to take back to IBM and say "plz fix".
<xnox> and it was counter intuitive for millenials like me to do $ sudo 
modprobe kvm; to get libvirt+qemu working
[...]
<cpaelzer> the place to autoload would be /usr/share/qemu/init/qemu-kvm-init 
that is where the others do it
<infinity> cpaelzer: Yeah, that's a gross hack because there's no proper 
autoloading.
<cpaelzer> true
<infinity> cpaelzer: Since that init job only exists if you install qemu, 
modular everywhere would save a tiny bit of boot time on pure guests.  So maybe 
it's worth evaluating
[...]
<infinity> But I'm all for kernel configs being as normalized as possible 
across arches.

I'm not saying we "should" change anything, but since I wondered about that 
arch difference more people will do so as well.
So we should consciously evaluate, do we want to:
1. keep it built-in as it is now
2. change it to a module and rely on qemu-kvm to load it
3. change it to a module and let IBM upstream do autoload where it is supported

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657733

Title:
  KVM module handling different per Architecture - s390x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1657733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to