[Bug 1662811] Re: sane-backends should go back to syncing with unstable

2022-03-11 Thread David Ward
jammy now imports sane-backends from unstable without modification. ** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662811

[Bug 1662811] Re: sane-backends should go back to syncing with unstable

2017-08-14 Thread JohnWashington
When this is fixed will it be backported to 16.04? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662811 Title: sane-backends should go back to syncing with unstable To manage notifications about t

[Bug 1662811] Re: sane-backends should go back to syncing with unstable

2017-02-09 Thread Rolf Leggewie
@pitti, according to the changelog you made the decision to upload the Debian experimental package of sane-backends way back when. I think it would be only fair if you assumed some responsibility to rectify the multitude of problems this has created. We need to get back to syncing or at least mer

[Bug 1662811] Re: sane-backends should go back to syncing with unstable

2017-02-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662811 Title

[Bug 1662811] Re: sane-backends should go back to syncing with unstable

2017-02-08 Thread Rolf Leggewie
** Description changed: It's high time that Ubuntu went back to syncing from unstable after veering off into Debian experimental space which the Debian Maintainer has expressly condemned several times in this tracker. Unfortunately, that won't happen before z+1. I'll see if I can't provi