I won't disagree with that, but it's an unscheduled thing. I filed
against notify-osd as it's what is providing the
org.freedesktop.Notifications interface currently. There is no way in
the spec to specify how private something is, so we'd need to add some
custom X-property for that I think. It wou
I actually think this should be handled in the notification-center-to-
be, so that the queued notifications are there once the session is
unlocked.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673471
** Also affects: unity8 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: unity8 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukáš Tinkl (lukas-kde)
** Changed in: unity8 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
** Package changed: notify-osd (Ubuntu) => unity-notifications (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673471
Title:
No way to obscure or prevent notifications when screen locked
To
