> On the other hand, persisting with an architecture where apps don't
work unless processes other than the shell happen to be running is a bit
nasty in my opinion. And similarly anything that depends on a bus is
ugly IMHO. I've lost count of the number of times in recent months where
GTK apps
That all said... why don't we just declare gnome-screenshot unsupported
if it's really just a client of gnome-shell. Doesn't Unity8 have other
adequate screenshotting mechanisms?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
"Is there some mir client api for scraping the screen?"
Yes, but it's also not nice. See src/utils/screencast.cpp. That's why I
suggest we need to fix Mir in bug 1660269.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On one hand asking the shell to own screenshotting is nice and secure.
On the other hand, persisting with an architecture where apps don't work
unless processes other than the shell happen to be running is a bit
nasty in my opinion. And similarly anything that depends on a bus is
ugly IMHO. I've
I don't know if that would be the easiest approach. It sounds to me like
having U8 implement that dbus interface would be the easiest and least
invasive solution, but then again, I'm not the one volunteering for that
:)
Is there some mir client api for scraping the screen? I'm worried about