[Bug 1689963] Re: [MIR] open-isns

2017-07-19 Thread Matthias Klose
promoted ** Changed in: open-isns (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1689963 Title: [MIR] open-isns To manage notifications about

[Bug 1689963] Re: [MIR] open-isns

2017-07-12 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
There's some work being done to include the tests in DEP-8 or otherwise, so I think we're good to move open-isns to main now; MIR approved. ** Changed in: open-isns (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: open-isns (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-17.05 => ubuntu-17.07 -- You

[Bug 1689963] Re: [MIR] open-isns

2017-06-28 Thread Emily Ratliff
Since this code was in main as part of the open-iscsi package in xenial, the security team is going to ack it without requiring a full review. ** Changed in: open-isns (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) => Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox) -- You received this bug

Re: [Bug 1689963] Re: [MIR] open-isns

2017-06-21 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On 21.06.2017 [04:32:18 -], Christian Seiler wrote: > Hi, > > I'm one of the Debian Maintainers of open-isns and I just saw this bug > here because I saw the upstream pull request for the fixes to the test > suite. First of all: thanks for improving the package. The main reason > I've

[Bug 1689963] Re: [MIR] open-isns

2017-06-20 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, I'm one of the Debian Maintainers of open-isns and I just saw this bug here because I saw the upstream pull request for the fixes to the test suite. First of all: thanks for improving the package. The main reason I've packaged that is because it was split out of open-iscsi, and I'm not really

[Bug 1689963] Re: [MIR] open-isns

2017-06-20 Thread Nish Aravamudan
The linked MR adds a DEP8 test (which passes locally on amd64) for the upstream test suite. I've asked for Mathieu to review it before I upload, but it does seem sane (I've pushed all the upstream changes upstream as GitHub PRs as well) -- I had to skip one test, because I really don't understand

Re: [Bug 1689963] Re: [MIR] open-isns

2017-05-12 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote: > There's a subscriber and the package generally looks fine; modulo > looking to see if tests can be run at build time. I've got a patch locally that does seem to do this, but the tests fail, because I think

[Bug 1689963] Re: [MIR] open-isns

2017-05-12 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
There's a subscriber and the package generally looks fine; modulo looking to see if tests can be run at build time. However, since this is for iSNS, name services tend to be security- sensitive and there is some CVE history (not for open-isns specifically, but...) for iSNS on Linux (for tgt