** Changed in: lxqt-session (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690491
Title:
Merge 0.11.1-2 from Debian Sid
To manage
This has been force synced and when Qt migrates (alongside this), I'll
mark this as Fix Released.
** Changed in: lxqt-session (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I'm working with Dimitry (mitya57) to get Qt 5.9.0 in Ubuntu Artful.
I'll rename the bug once this has been uploaded to artful-proposed so
that it can just be force synced, as Julien says (because I agree).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Julien, it looks like that change is part of Qt 5.9 which is not in
Ubuntu yet. Qt 5.9 is scheduled for release at the end of May and
~mitya57 was going to try to merge it into Ubuntu 17.10 after that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
The diff was introduced to be able to use lxqt-session with others
settings that the ones provided by lxqt-common. At this time, lxqt was
only capable to read settings from 1 path (the one provided by lxqt-
common). So, it was impossible to have both lxqt-common and lubuntu-
default-settings.
That's great to hear, and in fact it is actually a reason to just drop
this delta on lxqt-session…
@gilir ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690491
Title:
Merge 0.11.1-2 from Debian
Sorry, forget to mention that a small or no diff to debian would ease
the upgrade to 0.12 a lot - there are some breaks/replaces needed. Most
of the file moves will not be critical because of it's nature - esp. the
conf-file moves are handled fine with apt.
--
You received this bug notification
There is nothing wrong with the lxqt-common dependency. In fact no
autostart and some other things will run without and the common answer
to misc problems with LXQt and Ubuntu is: Just install lxqt-common.
Period.
The only thing that is wrong with lxqt-common: it exists. Maybe it was
not the best
Looking at this, I can not really understand why we would need this change.
What's wrong with a lxqt-common dependency?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690491
Title:
Merge 0.11.1-2
Attached is the patch completing this merge.
** Patch added: "2-to-2ubuntu1.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-session/+bug/1690491/+attachment/4875914/+files/2-to-2ubuntu1.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
10 matches
Mail list logo