[Bug 1692440] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2017-07-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From sbobr...@au1.ibm.com 2017-07-20 01:32 EDT--- (In reply to comment #17) > as mentioned by Sam but I could not see any difference with/without it. > Maybe it is needed for a specific scenario. That's expected. It just resolves a race condition that can produce a spurious

[Bug 1692440] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2017-07-07 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From alin...@br.ibm.com 2017-07-07 09:49 EDT--- I could confirm it is already working on QEMU 2.9 + P9 support patches. I also have added the commit 229e16fd247c7d39822627916d18b52f733cbfa1 ppc/xics: preserve P and Q bits for KVM IRQs as mentioned by Sam but I could not

[Bug 1692440] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2017-06-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bren...@br.ibm.com 2017-06-01 11:04 EDT--- Canonical, This is the Qemu patch we are talking about: 229e16fd247c7d39822627916d18b52f733cbfa1 ppc/xics: preserve P and Q bits for KVM IRQs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1692440] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2017-05-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From lagar...@br.ibm.com 2017-05-23 12:20 EDT--- (In reply to comment #4) > Hi, > thanks for starting the tracking of all related changes. > Is this in qemu 2.9, if not is it at least upstream and which are the > related commits? POWER9 support will come with QEMU 2.10. Sam,