[Expired for fio (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: fio (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1703440
Anything still left to be done for focal or later?
** Changed in: fio (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1703440
Title:
xenial fio 2.2.10
@fmyhr:
After grovelling through the fio commits I've come across
https://github.com/axboe/fio/commit/1e7f82e20c088e3f564ad24e37bb873b7ac37d3a
which says old versions of fio had problems reaching compressability
targets with large (above 64k) blocksizes which matches this launchpad
bug's scenario
Something else to bear in mind is that because you aren't using direct=1
(see http://fio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fio_doc.html#cmdoption-arg-
direct ) there's nothing (other than size) stopping your I/O being
entirely cached in RAM thus creating unrealistically fast speeds. Worse
still, there's a
