--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2018-11-23 10:29 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, won't fix be Canonical.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707875
Title:
--- Comment From ravi.bango...@in.ibm.com 2018-07-17 02:12 EDT---
I've observed the same issue on 18.04 as well. If we are not going to fix the
bug for any reversion, do we need to document the unavailability of the feature?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
--- Comment From pac...@us.ibm.com 2018-06-12 08:29 EDT---
What are the expectations for resolving this issue? Is there a plan?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707875
Title:
--- Comment From pac...@us.ibm.com 2018-05-01 09:33 EDT---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Python2 will not be maintained upstream past 2020, so a lack of python3
> bindings certainly feels like a non-starter. As for why the kernel team
> decided to drop the python build-dep in 13.04, I'm not
--- Comment From pac...@us.ibm.com 2018-04-24 12:39 EDT---
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #18)
> > we have not
> > enabled py bindings for perf in bionic. This has been the case since 13.04
> > days, and the reason for this is py (like 2.x vs 3.x) build dependencies,
>
>
--- Comment From pac...@us.ibm.com 2018-04-24 11:41 EDT---
(In reply to comment #18)
> we have not
> enabled py bindings for perf in bionic. This has been the case since 13.04
> days, and the reason for this is py (like 2.x vs 3.x) build dependencies,
Can you elaborate? I don't think the
--- Comment From pac...@us.ibm.com 2018-04-23 14:01 EDT---
any progress on this? It's not in the 18.04 image I just installed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707875
Title:
--- Comment From mainam...@in.ibm.com 2017-10-13 10:30 EDT---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Breno, we were at a team sprint last week, we should be back on our regular
> office hours this week. please allow for a few days for an update on this
> bug.
Hello Canonical,
Please confirm
--- Comment From pac...@us.ibm.com 2017-08-23 10:15 EDT---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Any chance we could pull in this patch as well:
>
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2017-August/161412.html
>
> It's recent enough that it has not made it to mainline, but it's
>
--- Comment From pac...@us.ibm.com 2017-08-02 16:33 EDT---
Any chance we could pull in this patch as well:
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2017-August/161412.html
It's recent enough that it has not made it to mainline, but it's
ppc64le-specific.
--
You received this bug
10 matches
Mail list logo
