[Bug 174038] Re: bad md5sum in Packages file

2008-04-21 Thread Chris Clonch
Any resolution on the horizon? I get this while using debmirror to create a local, private mirror for my company. Using the --ignore-small-errors allowed me to complete the mirror, but the security issues by not checking the md5's leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth. -- bad md5sum in

[Bug 174038] Re: bad md5sum in Packages file

2008-04-21 Thread Malcolm Scott
Indeed, I feel it would look very unprofessional to say the least if Hardy were to be released in a state in which it cannot be securely mirrored. Surely it is a simple matter for the right person to fix this? -- bad md5sum in Packages file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174038 You received

[Bug 174038] Re: bad md5sum in Packages file

2008-04-21 Thread Kees Cook
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: soyuz Status: Won't Fix = Confirmed -- bad md5sum in Packages file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 174038] Re: bad md5sum in Packages file

2008-04-21 Thread Kees Cook
I've uploaded no-change version-bumps for the two source packages. This likely won't fix Gutsy's mirroring, but it will be okay Hardy. Soyuz still needs to be fixed (or rather, the caches regenerated), so I've re- opened that part of the bug. -- bad md5sum in Packages file

[Bug 174038] Re: bad md5sum in Packages file

2008-04-21 Thread Kees Cook
** Also affects: mobile-player (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: mobile-application-service (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- bad md5sum in Packages file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174038 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 174038] Re: bad md5sum in Packages file

2008-04-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
motu-release ack. ** Changed in: mobile-application-service (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: mobile-player (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- bad md5sum in Packages file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174038 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 174038] Re: bad md5sum in Packages file

2008-04-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package mobile-player - 0.4ubuntu1 --- mobile-player (0.4ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low * No-change version bump to work around LP: #174038. -- Kees Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:13:47 -0700 ** Changed in: mobile-player (Ubuntu)

[Bug 174038] Re: bad md5sum in Packages file

2008-04-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package mobile-application-service - 0.9-6 --- mobile-application-service (0.9-6) hardy; urgency=low * No-change version-bump to work around LP: #174038. -- Kees Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:14:29 -0700 -- bad md5sum in Packages file

[Bug 174038] Re: bad md5sum in Packages file

2008-02-02 Thread Celso Providelo
Michael, I've re-generated a-f caches in dogfood (took around 4 hours) and it fixed the problem, see http://archive.dogfood.launchpad.net/ubuntu/dists/hardy/ I don't think this is the only solution available, but it's nice to have it as an alternative. -- bad md5sum in Packages file

[Bug 174038] Re: bad md5sum in Packages file

2008-01-15 Thread Malcolm Scott
I note that debmirror will refuse to update a mirror in this situation, so no mirrors using debmirror will update until this is fixed. -- bad md5sum in Packages file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the

Re: [Bug 174038] Re: bad md5sum in Packages file

2008-01-15 Thread Kees Cook
If you run debmirror with --ignore-small-errors it will complete. -- bad md5sum in Packages file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 174038] Re: bad md5sum in Packages file

2008-01-07 Thread Celso Providelo
Michael, Can you help us to debug the current a-f caches used in drescher and find 'if' and 'why' they got corrupted. I can copy the caches to another machine in DC (they have 2.3G in total). Thanks in advance. ** Also affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- bad