** Changed in: pcb
Milestone: pcb-4.2.0 => future-bug-fix-release
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771726
Title:
After gsch2pcb, pcb fails to open the new pcb file
To manage noti
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: geda (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771726
Title:
After
Hi guys-
I just wanted to check in on this and see if it's been resolved.
Dr. M-
I think Bert's above comment (post #13) was in reference to the "gotcha"
you mentioned in your earlier message (post #5). So, it may not be quite
as out-of-the-blue as it seems.
Can you please confirm the various v
Your link opens to a bug entitled "ALF footprint drill holes too tight"
That is almost completely not related to this bug.
If you follow the discussion change you will see that will found what is
causing the problem, and its being worked on as far as I know.
Its the footprint files that have a
Hi Dr M,
Regarding #5: AFAICT this was reported in LP699286
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/699286) and released in pcb-4.0.0.
Can you tell us which version of pcb you are using ?
Kind regards,
Bert Timmerman.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Tags added: import-schematics m4-lib
** Changed in: pcb
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771726
Title:
After gsch2pcb, pcb fails to open the new
There is a pcb file, in the zip file, that has the errant output.
On May 23, 2018 7:01 AM, "Roland Lutz" <1771...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> More specifically, should the output be
>
> PKG_DIODE_LAY 300(DIODE_LAY-300.fp,D1,unknown,300.fp)
>
> or
>
> PKG_DIODE_LAY_300(DIODE_LAY-300.fp,D1
> Here is the correct attachment.
The files are identical, just differently named.
> The scm files are different. Please see second attachment.
I have run both versions of gnet-gsch2pcb.scm on your example schematic
and got the same output:
...
PKG_JUMPER1.fp(JUMPER1.fp,CONN1,unknown)
More specifically, should the output be
PKG_DIODE_LAY 300(DIODE_LAY-300.fp,D1,unknown,300.fp)
or
PKG_DIODE_LAY_300(DIODE_LAY-300.fp,D1,unknown,300.fp)
or
PKG_DIODE_LAY-300(DIODE_LAY-300.fp,D1,unknown,300.fp)
or something else?
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
Oops, wrong attachment. Here is the correct attachment. The pcb file
has the errant element, see line 44.
The scm files are different. Please see second attachment.
On 05/22/2018 06:28 PM, Roland Lutz wrote:
>> Sure, please see attached.
> Which is which?
>
>> It might be of interest that g
> Sure, please see attached.
Which is which?
> It might be of interest that gsch2pcb from the fedora repository did
not fail in this way, even though it shows the same version number.
This is weird. Are the gnet-gsch2pcb.scm files identical?
--
You received this bug notification because you a
Sure, please see attached. Chad asked me for this also.
It might be of interest that gsch2pcb from the fedora repository did not
fail in this way, even though it shows the same version number.
On 05/22/2018 05:04 PM, Roland Lutz wrote:
>> 2) The space in the file name breaks gsch2pcb, resultin
> 2) The space in the file name breaks gsch2pcb, resulting in corrupted
elements in the pcb file.
Could you please provide me with an example broken output file, as well
as a manually patched working output file, so I can fix this in
gsch2pcb?
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
I am using the ALF footprints for the diode. Those are pretty good.
The DIODE_LAY footprints have another "gotcha", the drill holes are too
small.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177172
** Changed in: pcb
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: pcb
Milestone: None => pcb-4.2.0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771726
Title:
After gsch2pcb, pcb fails to ope
Thanks Mitch.
Point 1 is sort of iffy. In general, it would be nice to support spaces
in filenames. Whether we like it or not, the computing world is moving
in a direction where it is expected that you can do this.
Point 2 is the real problem here, that gsch2pcb doesn't produce the
correct output
Found the source of the problem. There are three bugs that come
together to produce this behavior
1) The footprint files "DIODE_LAY 300.fp", and other in different
sizes, have a space in the file name.
2) The space in the file name breaks gsch2pcb, resulting in corrupted
elements in the pcb
Running it from the command line, here is the error message:
LoadPCB: Failed to load existing file "TDAQ_LT1226CurrentAmpBoard.pcb".
Is it supported PCB file?
Note that before copying the element files into it, pcb opened the file
without problems.
--
You received this bug notification because
Another test, created a new pcb file and manually copied the elements
loaded into the .new.pcb file by gsch2pcb, and again the pcb program
fails to open the pcb. The elements are all standard elements from the
geda tree.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
19 matches
Mail list logo
