[Bug 1791143] Re: Suggestion to make zfsutils-linux a snap

2022-03-01 Thread Ted Cabeen
I would strongly discourage putting zfs-utils into a snap. I expect many systems admins running zfs storage arrays do not install snapd, and would be loathe to do so. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Bug 1791143] Re: Suggestion to make zfsutils-linux a snap

2021-10-07 Thread Colin Ian King
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Colin Ian King (colin-king) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791143 Title: Suggestion to make zfsutils-li

[Bug 1791143] Re: Suggestion to make zfsutils-linux a snap

2020-09-07 Thread Colin Ian King
I'll put this on the wish-list agenda for 21.04 ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Ian King (colin-king) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791143 Titl

[Bug 1791143] Re: Suggestion to make zfsutils-linux a snap

2020-09-07 Thread Andrea Righi
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791143 Title:

[Bug 1791143] Re: Suggestion to make zfsutils-linux a snap

2019-08-27 Thread Sam Van den Eynde
As kernels 5.2.0-x will bring zfs 0.8.x to Bionic LTS, I'd like to draw some attention to this request. People will get the 0.8.x zfs module via HWE but won't be able to do much with the major new features without the userland tools. I tried to install the debs from Eoan, but they require a higher

[Bug 1791143] Re: Suggestion to make zfsutils-linux a snap

2018-09-06 Thread Sam Van den Eynde
My main reason for suggesting this is that it seems Canonical is easier on snaps wrt. having rolling upgrades. I don't see a reason debs can't do it, but I notice over and over again Canonical is very conservative upgrading major software versions on debs (which is no criticism, just a constatation

[Bug 1791143] Re: Suggestion to make zfsutils-linux a snap

2018-09-06 Thread Richard Laager
Is there something inherent in snaps that makes this easier or better than debs? For example, do snaps support multiple installable versions of the same package name? If snaps aren’t inherently better, the same thing could be done with debs using the usual convention for having multiple versions i