[Bug 1802069] Re: test_095_kernel_symbols_missing_proc_self_stack failed with Xenial kernel

2018-11-08 Thread Steve Beattie
Yep, thanks, I'll take a look at fixing that today. ** Changed in: qa-regression-testing Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: qa-regression-testing Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Beattie (sbeattie) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 1802069] Re: test_095_kernel_symbols_missing_proc_self_stack failed with Xenial kernel

2018-11-09 Thread Steve Beattie
I've now adjusted the test take the backported commit into account for 4.4 kernels and going forward for 4.19+ kernels in https://git.launchpad.net/qa-regression- testing/commit/?id=0a556d8677d0acd429becc4f49b5a9c59ff27135 . Thanks!. ** Changed in: qa-regression-testing Status: Triaged =>

[Bug 1802069] Re: test_095_kernel_symbols_missing_proc_self_stack failed with Xenial kernel

2018-11-14 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
** Changed in: linux-lts-xenial (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1802069 Title: test_095_kernel_symbols_missing_proc_self_stack failed with Xenial

[Bug 1802069] Re: test_095_kernel_symbols_missing_proc_self_stack failed with Xenial kernel

2018-11-14 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
** Changed in: ubuntu-kernel-tests Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1802069 Title: test_095_kernel_symbols_missing_proc_self_stack failed with X

[Bug 1802069] Re: test_095_kernel_symbols_missing_proc_self_stack failed with Xenial kernel

2018-11-07 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
So the issue lies within the _read_twice() in test-kernel-security.py script. The first attempt to cat /proc/self/stack will return 0, as it's reading the file as root. The second attempt will failed with "permission denied" as we're not allowing regular user to access that file anymore. But th