** Changed in: gtk
Importance: Unknown = Critical
--
gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard against recursion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
the bug has been fixed in hardy now
** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard against recursion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Debian)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard against recursion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
Nice. I also have that problem.. just for records :)
--
gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard against recursion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
This is fixed in trunk, but not in the 2.12 branch (at least not yet)
--
gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard against recursion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
Indeed, but since they accepted the patch this means two things:
* it is possible that it will be available in the next gtk2.12
release,
* it is probably good enough for us to patch our gtk in the meantime.
(we already do!)
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 18:56 +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
To clarify, we already do! means patch GTK, not apply this particular
patch to our GTK.
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 19:16 +, William Pitcock wrote:
Indeed, but since they accepted the patch this means two things:
* it is possible that it will be available in the next gtk2.12
release,
* it
** Changed in: gtk
Status: New = Fix Released
--
gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard against recursion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
The bug has been fixed upstream now
** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
--
gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard against recursion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low = Medium
--
gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard against recursion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
Sébastien: can you comment on this one?
--
gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard against recursion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
The crash is not a frequent one apparentl so I would prefer to wait for
upstream or debian to commit a fix so we don't have to get ubuntu
specific changes to gtk
** Tags added: need-amd64-retrace
--
gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard against recursion
I'm not sure about not a frequent one as, for me, with the unpatched
libgtk, gnome-panel crashes about once every three builds (and I tend to
have between a dozen and a score builds daily, so that's often enough to
be incredibly annoying). It appears to be related to larger amounts of
RAM/cache,
The comment about the bug not being frequent is due to the 0 duplicates
--
gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard against recursion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
An amd64 retrace is not needed. I have already fixed the bug locally
(and Emmet is also running my patch) and sent a patch upstream. The main
issue is fixing it in Ubuntu at this point, as this bug is unacceptable
for Hardy.
I've also sent the patch to Debian, so committing it there and syncing
The bug will be fixed before hardy, no worries. The retracing was just
to get debug informations before removing the coredump attached to the
bug. No need to add that much emphasis to the comments words, the bug
has not been ignored
** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) =
Setting the milestone to hardy, the patch will be applied in Ubuntu
later if there is no new upstream tarball or debian update including the
change
--
gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard against recursion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180463
You received this bug
There are actually several probable duplicates. I've gone ahead and
marked them based on backtrace.
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 12:32 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
The comment about the bug not being frequent is due to the 0 duplicates
** Tags removed: need-amd64-retrace
--
** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Debian)
Status: Unknown = New
--
gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard against recursion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: gtk
Status: Unknown = New
--
gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard against recursion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Summary changed:
- gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in idle_populate_func()
+ gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard against recursion
** Tags added: debdiff
** Tags removed: apport-crash need-amd64-retrace
--
gtk_recent_files_menu_populate() does not properly guard
21 matches
Mail list logo
