[Bug 1813601] Re: tree and better recursive directory sizing

2019-01-31 Thread Prasanna V. Loganathar
Hi Ian, Thank you for the reply. I appreciate it :) .. However I think you may have replied to an older version of the bug description. I did miss the "--du" option initially, but then had updated the description accordingly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

Re: [Bug 1813601] Re: tree and better recursive directory sizing

2019-01-30 Thread Ian Bruntlett
Hi, On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 20:15, Prasanna V. Loganathar < 1813...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Description changed: > > Currently `tree -dh`/`tree -h` simply shows the size of the directory > nodes that tend to be 4K in a default ext4 installation with 4K block > sizes. While this is no

[Bug 1813601] Re: tree and better recursive directory sizing

2019-01-30 Thread Prasanna V. Loganathar
** Description changed: Currently `tree -dh`/`tree -h` simply shows the size of the directory nodes that tend to be 4K in a default ext4 installation with 4K block sizes. While this is not very useful in terms of UX, it does however have it's use by not spending a whole lot of IO on calcul