This bug was fixed in the package resolvconf - 1.78ubuntu7
---
resolvconf (1.78ubuntu7) xenial; urgency=medium
* bin/resolvconf: use flock so resolvconf can be called in parallel
safely (LP: #1825194).
-- Alfonso Sanchez-Beato (email Canonical) Mon, 06 May 2019 10:39:40
I have tested on xenial, the problem is solved with the change.
ubuntu@xenial:~$ apt policy resolvconf
resolvconf:
Installed: 1.78ubuntu7
Candidate: 1.78ubuntu7
Version table:
*** 1.78ubuntu7 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed/main amd64 Packages
100
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:42:24PM -, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Per
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resolvconf/+bug/1825194/comments/4,
> I believe this is "uninteresting" to fix for releases other than xenial;
> xenial needs it because UC16 is netplan+resolvconf and may have both
>
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:22:20PM -, Robie Basak wrote:
> Unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors.
> Are you planning on fixing Bionic, Cosmic or Disco?
Per
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resolvconf/+bug/1825194/comments/4,
I believe this is "uninteresting" to fix for releases other than
Unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors.
Are you planning on fixing Bionic, Cosmic or Disco?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825194
Title:
[SRU] resolvconf is racy, which leads to broken
Hello Alfonso, or anyone else affected,
Accepted resolvconf into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resolvconf/1.78ubuntu7 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Thanks Robie, good catch. Please find attached the new patch for xenial:
I have moved a bit below the call to flock to ensure the dir was created
- the lines now out of the lock do not change any files so that should
not be a problem.
** Patch added: "xenial-debdiff.patch"
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 05:25:22PM -, Robie Basak wrote:
> Will this also need addressing in the development release?
It looks like it to me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825194
Will this also need addressing in the development release?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825194
Title:
[SRU] resolvconf is racy, which leads to broken resolv.conf in
parallel
Thanks Robie, that's a very good point and something I didn't notice
while sponsoring. Alfonso, do you want to adjust the patch to address
this? (That will also give us a chance to reupload the SRU and remove
the misapplied diff cruft.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Review question: what ensures that /run/resolvconf exists before flock
is called? I only see an "mkdir -p" inside the block, not outside it.
flock doesn't seem to create parent directories automatically in my
test, and I don't see a tmpfiles.d entry.
--
You received this bug notification because
(please note that the changelog had to be adjusted; the current version
of resolvconf in xenial-updates is 1.78ubuntu6.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825194
Title:
[SRU]
uploaded to the SRU queue.
** Changed in: resolvconf (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825194
Title:
[SRU] resolvconf is racy, which
** Changed in: resolvconf (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: resolvconf (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
14 matches
Mail list logo
