This bug report is being closed per your last comment. For future
reference you can manage the status of your own bugs by clicking on the
current status in the yellow line and then choosing a new status in the
revealed drop down box. You can learn more about bug statuses at
aufs is in l-u-m now and all needed patches are applied to the ubuntu
kernel. This can be closed.
--
Please add simple lhash patch for aufs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182603
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
Michael S. Zick was kind enough to submit an updated patch to the aufs-
users mailing list. It applies to the Ubuntu kernel with some offsets.
Junjiro Okajima, the aufs maintainer, also commented on the patch: I
think it is good.
Please ignore the patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
To be considered if we are going support aufs.
--
Please add simple lhash patch for aufs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182603
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
That's what I was planning next, actually: Make a patch to add aufs to
linux-ubuntu-modules. In my tests, it's proven to be much more reliable
than unionfs (which is still version 1.4 in hardy).
I'm currently adding support for diskless clients to Mythbuntu and I
*need* aufs for that - unionfs
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
Please add simple lhash patch for aufs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182603
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the
Oops. It looks like the lhash patch does not apply cleanly to 2.6.24
anymore, I'll try to get an updated version.
--
Please add simple lhash patch for aufs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182603
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact
