Changing status as Martin's questions seems to have been answered.
** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Cool package!
I've had an APC BackUPS ES with a usb since 2002 but never even hooked
it up, assuming that was for a Windows world only. I'm glad to have
emerged from the darkness. I managed to get it monitoring working well
with this package, though I have a few suggestions that I hope can be
so
if somebody needs an MGE (and possibly a Powerware), please let me know.
For the recall, the former is the official NUT sponsor, and the only
UPS manufacturer 100 % pro FLOSS. And the latter might come soon (I'm
working hardly on this).
Arnaud
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Hi Pitti,
Yes we do have UPSes for testing, and we will be supporting this for 5
years since its apart of the ServerPackageRevew spec.
Thanks
chuck
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
I have an APC SmartUPS-700 and access to a Tripplite (post hardy).
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
kudos fellows.
I really like working with you ;-)
expect some new features and a better integration for HH+1...
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bu
Merged test-nut.py into qa-regression-testing
** Changed in: qa-regression-testing
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: qa-regression-testing
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jamie-strandboge)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
Thanks everyone! nut approved and promoted.
I asked Kees and Jamie to review and merge the test script.
** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Also affects: qa-regression-testing
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.
Oh, and please seed the package to somewhere, so that it stays in main.
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu
2008/2/27, Nick Barcet:
> I added your branch to this bug. Thanks a lot!
ok, I now see the light, thanks ;-)
-- Arnaud
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I added your branch to this bug. Thanks a lot!
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu
that did indeed ;-)
code committed.
the only remaining point is the bug: I'm not sure to understand you.
Should I add a comment on the present bug or? The "QA Regression
Testing does not use Launchpad as its bug tracker."
The branch is as located as per your comment:
https://code.edge.launchpad.ne
Arnaud Quette wrote:
> Following our discussion of last friday with Nick, I've quickly
> created a test-nut.py for the QA Regression Testing (master branch).
[...]
> what delivery method would you prefer (I tried logging a bug, but it's
> void)...
I believe you should just:
- create a new branch i
2008/2/21, Dustin Kirkland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Cool package!
thanks
> I've had an APC BackUPS ES with a usb since 2002 but never even hooked
> it up, assuming that was for a Windows world only. I'm glad to have
> emerged from the darkness. I managed to get it monitoring working well
> wi
Fellows,
Following our discussion of last friday with Nick, I've quickly
created a test-nut.py for the QA Regression Testing (master branch).
I've already explained the general idea to Nick, but for the others,
here is a quick brief:
- NUT provides a dummy driver (dummy-ups) that loads its data f
fellows,
2008/2/20, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks, Arnaud for the report improvements, and Jamie for the security
> review.
you're welcome ;-)
> The packages, as well as the current level of proactive security
> seems adequate to me.
>
> Since this package is likely to need some real
Thanks, Arnaud for the report improvements, and Jamie for the security
review. The packages, as well as the current level of proactive security
seems adequate to me.
Since this package is likely to need some real maintenance and support,
I'd like to get some commitments on this before approval.
just some comments to ease your audit:
- all the mentioned functions (upslog*, upsdebug*, fatal*) point to
vupslog, and vupslog use only numbered copy functions,
- we centralize as much as possible such kind of functions to manage
the security and reliability of NUT,
- we enforce in general the use
Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionReportNut for details on
my (very) high-level audit.
** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
well, that will have to wait for NUT 2.4, so HH+1...
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://
reconfirmed with Martin; we should address Jamie's concerns and the
"Completely unprivileged upsmon" before inclusion in main.
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for U
Hi Jamie,
2008/2/8, Jamie Strandboge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Arnaud,
>
> I was curious as to why the Debian packaging doesn't do the 'security
> domains' as listed in:
> http://www.networkupstools.org/faq/
>
> or even the chrooting as in:
> http://www.networkupstools.org/doc/2.2.0/chroot.html
wel
Arnaud,
I was curious as to why the Debian packaging doesn't do the 'security domains'
as listed in:
http://www.networkupstools.org/faq/
or even the chrooting as in:
http://www.networkupstools.org/doc/2.2.0/chroot.html
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You receive
** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
h
I've uploaded nut 2.2.1-1 yesterday in Debian.
I've logged a sync request too:
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/185565
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bu
guys,
first; it's a pleasure to see this since I wasn't aware of ;-)
I took the liberty to complete it a bit the report.
some more notes:
- 2.2.1 packages are underway (should be done by the end of this
week). I've been busy with many things upstream... and real life
> - the shared libraries sho
- upstream == debian, so it's strange that the activity status is that different
- the package done by debian is outdated (2.2.0); please update to the 2.2.1
release for hardy
see http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.2/ChangeLog
- the shared libraries should be split out into its own binary p
- ubuntu-security, please could you provide a source code review of the
server part?
--
main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
29 matches
Mail list logo
