[Bug 184101] Re: Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer

2008-02-27 Thread Matt T. Proud
Closing since clock-setup mediates this functionality. ** Changed in: rdate (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Invalid -- Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184101 You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Bug 184101] Re: Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer

2008-02-14 Thread Cesare Tirabassi
Unsubscribing u-u-s since it seems there is nothing required from them. -- Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184101 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ub

[Bug 184101] Re: Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer

2008-02-10 Thread Liam Bedford
My version of the use case is that gpgv fails if the time is incorrect (by enough). So when debian-installer comes to use apt-get fully and authenticating the Release file, it fails. -- Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1

[Bug 184101] Re: Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer

2008-02-09 Thread Colin Watson
clock-setup is definitely included by default; it's just not in the initrd. (Note that it is Priority: standard, which is one of the other ways to get included by default.) It could probably be brought back to 1800, but it's worth bearing in mind that that would break preseed files that set clock-

[Bug 184101] Re: Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer

2008-02-07 Thread Matt T. Proud
Nice! I'm glad to know that clock-setup takes care of this. From looking at debian-installer, it appears that clock-setup is not included by default; no wonder I didn't think of it. ;-) I'm curious: clock-setup's post-installation script starts at 2600. This seems a little late. Would there be an

[Bug 184101] Re: Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer

2008-02-04 Thread Colin Watson
I think this is the wrong place to do this. rdate-udeb exists to be used by clock-setup, which already has a menu item, deals with running rdate, etc. Shouldn't clock-setup be the place for these changes instead? -- Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer https

[Bug 184101] Re: Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer

2008-02-04 Thread Matt T. Proud
Daniel, Thanks for your prompt response to this bug. Attached is an updated debdiff. I made the following changes to the patch in addition to the ones you've asked for: The rdate-udeb already had support for SNTP (RFC 2030) synchronization in addition to Time (RFC 868), so I added the ability t

[Bug 184101] Re: Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer

2008-02-01 Thread Daniel Hahler
Thank you for your contribution. Please change your debdiff to match the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField spec. You can just run "update-maintainer" in the source directory and then rebuild the source package. ** Changed in: rdate (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist A

[Bug 184101] Re: Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer

2008-01-18 Thread Matt T. Proud
** Attachment added: "Debdiff patch against Ubuntu Hardy." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11431169/rdate-preseed-support.patch -- Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184101 You received this bug notification because you ar