This bug was fixed in the package klibc - 2.0.6-1ubuntu2
---
klibc (2.0.6-1ubuntu2) eoan; urgency=medium
* Fix FTBFS on eoan and later with new linux and gcc (LP: #1843743)
- cf-protection.patch: Disable cf-protection for syscalls stub.
- mman-include.patch: Adjust for chang
This bug was fixed in the package klibc - 2.0.6-1ubuntu2
---
klibc (2.0.6-1ubuntu2) eoan; urgency=medium
* Fix FTBFS on eoan and later with new linux and gcc (LP: #1843743)
- cf-protection.patch: Disable cf-protection for syscalls stub.
- mman-include.patch: Adjust for chang
The builds all succeeded, and tested booting on amd64 (the only arch
likely to be affected, due to cf-protection changes in the toolchain),
and it booted fine. Marking v-done.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-eoan
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-eoan
--
Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,
Accepted klibc into eoan-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/2.0.6-1ubuntu2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.
Oh, klibc has the same cc-option magic as the kernel's Kbuild does, so
that's the correct upstream answer. I'll update my patch to use that
when I merge 2.0.7.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
** Description changed:
- https://launchpadlibrarian.net/441262209/buildlog_ubuntu-eoan-
- amd64.klibc_2.0.6-1ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
+ [ SRU Justification / Impact ]
+ klibc is FTBFS in eoan. As we have a history of SRUing klibc to add new
features, we should probably make sure it's buildable.
> The best guess I can come up with is that there's something different
> about the compiler defaults you're using
Derp, this was the hint I needed. The attached patch fixes the build on
Ubuntu, though I can't think of a good way to upstream this, as the
compiler option in question isn't availabl
Steve Langasek wrote:
> The root failure is:
> objcopy -O binary usr/klibc/syscalls/typesize.o
> usr/klibc/syscalls/typesize.bin
> mkdir -p usr/include/klibc/; perl /tmp/klibc-2.0.6/usr/klibc/syscalls.pl -2
> usr/klibc/syscalls/SYSCALLS.i
> /tmp/klibc-2.0.6/usr/klibc/arch/x86_64/sysstub.ph x
-- Forwarded message --
From: Adam Conrad
Message-ID:
<157106879908.15546.2658970073129703906.mal...@soybean.canonical.com>
2.0.7-1 fails to build in the same way on Ubuntu 19.10. I'm assuming
it's either glibc 2.30 (Debian is at 2.29) or linux 5.3 (Debian is at
5.2), with th
2.0.7-1 fails to build in the same way on Ubuntu 19.10. I'm assuming
it's either glibc 2.30 (Debian is at 2.29) or linux 5.3 (Debian is at
5.2), with the latter being more likely.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:
Probably fixed in 2.0.7 which fixed a parallel make issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843743
Title:
klibc ftbfs in eoan
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bug
The root failure is:
objcopy -O binary usr/klibc/syscalls/typesize.o
usr/klibc/syscalls/typesize.bin
mkdir -p usr/include/klibc/; perl /tmp/klibc-2.0.6/usr/klibc/syscalls.pl -2
usr/klibc/syscalls/SYSCALLS.i /tmp/klibc-2.0.6/usr/klibc/arch/x86_64/sysstub.ph
x86_64 64 usr/klibc/syscalls/syscal
** Tags added: id-5d7f798147e05c832903635b
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843743
Title:
klibc ftbfs in eoan
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
** Also affects: klibc (Ubuntu Eoan)
Importance: High
Status: Confirmed
** Tags removed: rls-ee-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843743
Title:
klibc ftbfs in eoan
14 matches
Mail list logo
