[Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work

2019-10-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package binutils - 2.32.90.20190929-0ubuntu2 --- binutils (2.32.90.20190929-0ubuntu2) eoan; urgency=medium * Snapshot, taken from the 2.33 branch (20190929). - Fix PR25031, nm reports wrong address on 32bit. LP: #1845190. - Fix PR25018, readelf cras

[Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work

2019-09-26 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags removed: rls-ee-incoming ** Tags added: rls-ee-notfixing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work To manage notificat

[Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work

2019-09-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I think this should land in Ubuntu as part of a regular snapshot upload of binutils. I.e. without any special cherrypicking. This may or might not be fixed in Eoan or f-cycle. ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work

2019-09-24 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: binutils Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work To manage notific

[Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work

2019-09-24 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: binutils Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work To manage notifications ab

[Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work

2019-09-24 Thread MarcH
> on amd64 it works correctly: > > nm elfmix1.not_a > return42_or_3_long_name.o: > T return42_or_3 > return42_or_3_long_name.obj: > T return42_or_3 No, on amd64 the bug is the same as on i386. The correct output on both i386 and amd64 must be: return42_or_3_long

[Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work

2019-09-24 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: rls-ee-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https:/

[Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work

2019-09-24 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 2 comments from the remote bug at https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25031. If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://h