** Changed in: manpages (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18574
Title:
/etc/environment lacks man page.
To manage notifications abou
Oops, dumpling. Sorry. I have no write access to revert me changes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18574
Title:
/etc/environment lacks man page.
To manage notifications about
The point here is that /etc/environment is a pam_env(8) thing. The
pam_env(8) page documents /etc/environment, but users can't easily
discover that information. There needs to me a man page "link" ,
environmen(5), that points to pam_env(8). I filed this report to get
that fixed:
https://fedorahost
Also, given a file /etc/foo then one would expect foo to be the name of
the man page; not bar. Thus environment(5), not environ(7).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18574
Title:
No, environ(7) documents the "char **environ" symbol that program can
expect to find and that contain environment variables. That's not
connected to environment(5) that describes a file format for a file that
contains environment variables, e.g. are comments allowed. Other
problems stated by this
The valid page is environ.7, which exists. LANGUAGE variable is not
described by environ.7, but it’s an other problem treated in the bug :
#311558.
** Changed in: manpages (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
I've done a little reading and it appears /etc/environment is indeed a
configuration file for Linux-PAM
man PAM("PAM" must be in capitals "pam" is something else)
Also had a look at Linux-PAM System Administrators Guide
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/Linux-PAM-html/sag-pam_env
Confirmed same output in Maverick.
lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu maverick (development branch)
Release:10.10
apt-cache policy manpages
manpages:
Installed: 3.24-1ubuntu1
Candidate: 3.24-1ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 3.24-1ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/u
still in lucid
$ dpkg -S /etc/environment
dpkg: /etc/environment not found.
$ man environment
No manual entry for environment
--
/etc/environment lacks man page.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18574
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct su
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 07:37:27PM -, rusivi1 wrote:
> Does this issue occur in Lucid?
Goodness me. Is it so hard to check for the presence of a man page
before asking the reporter? Please don't ask for confirmation of bugs
you can check for yourself.
status triaged
** Changed in: manpag
Thank you for posting this bug.
Does this issue occur in Lucid?
** Changed in: manpages (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
/etc/environment lacks man page.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18574
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Still in 9.10 Karmic Koala.
In addition, LD_LIBRARY_PATH can't get loaded from /etc/environment
since Jaunty, see bug #366728
--
/etc/environment lacks man page.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18574
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct su
In a discussion on a Java application, there was a tip on checking the
/etc/environment file
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freemind/+bug/212588). I have
the file, but have never changed it myself. It is not owned by a
package. I don't dare to change it manually. What if my changes are
still in jaunty
Note: OpenBSD does not consider missing man pages on configuration files
to be minor, which is why I continue to enjoy sysadmin under OpenBSD
more so than Ubuntu.
This is a sysadmin papercut: a minor defect that could be easily fixed
which griefs nearly everyone who has to figure
still in hardy
--
/etc/environment lacks man page.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18574
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/u
Interesting part from /usr/share/doc/belocs-locales-bin/NEWS.Debian.gz:
> * Locale variables are now stored in /etc/default/locale and no more
>/etc/environment. The reason is that Debian Policy forbids modifying
>configuration files of other packages, and /etc/environment is a
>conf
And feisty.
--
/etc/environment lacks man page.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/18574
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
And Edgy.
--
/etc/environment lacks man page.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/18574
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
This is still an issue on 6.06.
** Changed in: manpages (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
/etc/environment lacks man page.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/18574
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
19 matches
Mail list logo
