[Bug 1866909] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-04-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From naynj...@ibm.com 2020-04-10 16:15 EDT--- The upstream patch has an additional fix but it?s not critical for GA. It can get included as part of bug fixes. It also affects only power. The patch("powerpc/ima: fix secure boot rules in ima arch policy") is posted to linux-int

[Bug 1866909] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-04-06 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From naynj...@ibm.com 2020-04-06 11:23 EDT--- Tested the updated ppa kernel. Everything looks good and here are the test results: secure boot is enabled as seen by device-tree entry "os-secure-enforcing" ubuntu@ltc-wspoon13:~$ ls /proc/device-tree/ibm,secureboot/ compatible

[Bug 1866909] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-04-03 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mranw...@us.ibm.com 2020-04-03 16:36 EDT--- We did some testing with that patch (previous comment) on top of the 5.4.0-21.25+lp1866909v202004020814 source/config file. We signed the kernel/modules and securely booted it. That fixed the module loading issue we were havi

[Bug 1866909] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-04-03 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mranw...@us.ibm.com 2020-04-03 12:45 EDT--- We've been working with Mimi and I think that what we need now aren't config option changes, but this patch: diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ima_arch.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ima_arch.c index e341162..c1ea55d 100644 --- a/arch/p

[Bug 1866909] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-04-03 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mranw...@us.ibm.com 2020-04-03 10:30 EDT--- Sorry, we don't know if we want CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE set. The modules aren't loading, and we weren't sure what needed to change. We're happy to try a kernel with IMA_ARCH_POLICY if that fixed it on x86. -- You received th

[Bug 1866909] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-04-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mranw...@us.ibm.com 2020-04-03 00:39 EDT--- We did check the modules - at least the package 5.4.0-21.25+lp1866909v202004020814 and from modinfo: signer: Build time autogenerated kernel key sig_key:3B:AB:B6:13:BE:1C:39:7C:C5:17:8E:6F:B4:C9:A1:7F:52:30:9B:8

[Bug 1866909] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-04-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From naynj...@ibm.com 2020-04-03 00:35 EDT--- With Michael's help, I could get the right key for the kernel. I updated the new key and then tried booting to signed kernel in secure boot enabled state. It seems kernel is being verified. # kexec -l /var/petitboot/mnt/dev/sdb6/bo

[Bug 1866909] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-04-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From naynj...@ibm.com 2020-04-02 21:53 EDT--- The kernel seems to be having the secure boot functions after enabling those CONFIGs. Now, I was trying to boot to this kernel when secure boot is enabled. I have taken the key from here - ppa.launchpad.net/sforshee/lp1866909/ubunt

[Bug 1866909] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-04-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mranw...@us.ibm.com 2020-04-02 17:37 EDT--- Thank you! I saw it finished and grabbed it, I saw it had the latest from lp 1855668. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Bug 1866909] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-04-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mranw...@us.ibm.com 2020-04-02 10:34 EDT--- Thank you, I grabbed that. Is there any chance of a PPA respin with those options? We did test on our rebuild, but we can't completely test without those options on plus the signing. -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 1866909] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-04-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mranw...@us.ibm.com 2020-04-01 18:31 EDT--- Thank you for spinning that so quickly. We neglected to request these config options get turned on: CONFIG_PPC_SECURE_BOOT=y CONFIG_PPC_SECVAR_SYSFS=y CONFIG_LOAD_PPC_KEYS=y CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY=y CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY=y We

[Bug 1866909] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-03-30 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From naynj...@ibm.com 2020-03-30 11:56 EDT--- I am sorry for the repetition on this question. Thanks & Regards, - Nayna -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866909 Title

[Bug 1866909] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-03-27 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From naynj...@ibm.com 2020-03-27 11:57 EDT--- Ok. Thanks for sharing the info. These ones should be very straightforward to backport. Thanks & Regards, - Nayna -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 1866909] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-03-27 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From naynj...@ibm.com 2020-03-27 10:00 EDT--- Below is the list of commits for specified TBDs (sysfs enablement/platform keyring changes for powerpc):. These were upstreamed in kernel v5.5 version. Platform Keyring changes for powerpc: 8220e22 - powerpc: Load firmware trusted

[Bug 1866909] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-03-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mranw...@us.ibm.com 2020-03-23 19:45 EDT--- Hi Frank, That's what I see, too, and all of those are in focal already, along with the other three whose titles matched. The config options in 500c7ab1a9db are already on in focal, too. The ones we're not sure of are these two