[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

This bug was fixed in the package python-barbicanclient - 4.6.0-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0 --- python-barbicanclient (4.6.0-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0) xenial-queens; urgency=medium . * New update for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. . python-barbicanclient (4.6.0-0ubuntu1.1) bionic; urgency=medium .

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

Hello Corey, This package is available on B, E, F, G. I don't think is strictly required to be backported into the queens cloud archive for other than having this package in the correct pocket (UCA). As I expressed in the bug description, The combination that triggers this issue is octavia + barb

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

This bug was fixed in the package python-barbicanclient - 4.6.0-0ubuntu1.1 --- python-barbicanclient (4.6.0-0ubuntu1.1) bionic; urgency=medium [ Corey Bryant ] * d/gbp.conf: Create stable/queens branch. [ Jorge Niedbalski ] * d/p/0001-Allow-fetching-by-UUID-and-respect-interf

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

Hello, I've verified that the current -proposed package fixes the issue for us, for the given use case. Using the following deployment bundle on a Bionic + Rocky cloud http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/jnVdVvQg7k/ Without the patch, the problem is reproduced as expressed on the case description: ubuntu

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

Hello Jorge, or anyone else affected, Accepted python-barbicanclient into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /python-barbicanclient/4.6.0-0ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing th

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

@sil2100 hello lukasz I've added a **IMPACTED VERSIONS NOTE note in the description. Any user running Bionic may hit this issue if running the library in standalone and hitting the same endpoints. However, this is unlikely to be manifested by any user, unless it is deployed with octavia (whic

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

Thank you for preparing this SRU! I think I'm fine with the SRU contents-wise, but I'd like to first have some clarification on the situation here. So as I understand it correctly, users running bionic only (without UCA enabled) also experience this issue now, yes? -- You received this bug notifi

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

** Changed in: python-barbicanclient (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: python-barbicanclient (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

since this is in the Bionic unapproved upload queue already, i'm removing ubuntu-sponsors. I'm leaving sts-sponsors subscribed to help nudge the upload through until it reaches bionic-updates. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

Hello @racb @coreycb, I've updated the description, testing and others sections. Is there anything left to be done at my side to continue with the SRU? Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

** Description changed: [Impact] Users of Ubuntu bionic running openstack clouds >= rocky can't create octavia load balancers listeners anymore since the backport of the following patch: https://opendev.org/openstack/octavia/commit/a501714a76e04b33dfb24c4ead9956ed4696d1df This

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

> I can't identify any regression potential for the fix... I don't understand why this makes it impossible to identify the area of functionality being changed to assist with targeted testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

Thanks! I think this is a rather special case. Since the Ubuntu archive isn't itself affected by this bug, it's not obvious to me that an SRU to the Ubuntu archive is justified, instead of expecting this to be fixed in UCA only. I've made a note to discuss this with the SRU team. -- You received

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

@racb, thank you very much for the review. I've updated description, versions and the regression potential of the SRU template. ** Description changed: [Impact] - Users of Ubuntu bionic running openstack clouds >= rocky - can't create octavia load balancers listeners anymore since the backp

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

Thank you for the update! The user impact is much more understandable now. The Regression Potential section is still missing "a discussion of how regressions are most likely to manifest, or may manifest even if it is unlikely, as a result of this change". Please can you update that also? > Users

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

** Description changed: + [Impact] + + Users of Ubuntu bionic running openstack clouds >= rocky + can't create octavia load balancers listeners anymore since the backport of the following patch: + + https://opendev.org/openstack/octavia/commit/a501714a76e04b33dfb24c4ead9956ed4696d1df + + Th

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

SRU review: Next time, please include dep3 headers such as Origin:. Given that you pinged in #ubuntu-devel to get this looked at, it would really help if you did the things that make SRU reviews easier. However this isn't a blocker. Apart from this the upload itself looks good. > As per https://s

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

Thanks Jorge. Uploaded to Bionic unapproved queue: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=python-barbicanclient ** Description changed: [Description] As per https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2007371 we identified that ubuntu clouds running the version

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

** Also affects: cloud-archive/queens Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: cloud-archive Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: cloud-archive/queens Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

** Also affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867676 Title: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception To

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

** Patch added: "Patch for bionic" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-barbicanclient/+bug/1867676/+attachment/5338009/+files/lp-1867676-bionic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1867676] Re: Fetching by secret container doesn't raises 404 exception

** Changed in: python-barbicanclient (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: python-barbicanclient (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Won't Fix => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bu