** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870314
Title:
[needs-packaging] google-guest-agent
To manage notifications about th
Thank you for the explaining the reasons. I understand the complexity of
having to support several distros with less advanced ability to handle
configuration files. This was the reason for me to switch to Debian, way
before Ubuntu was born. :-)
Since as you described the configuration file does no
It's a complicated situation, but I'll try to highlight some of the
reasons.
First, there is the complexity of existing files. We will only copy the
file if no file already exists because it may exist from the previous,
python guest which automatically generated this file. There are also the
.temp
Regarding the splitting of the packages GCE OS Config needs more time to
be ready for releasing it because the required version of the Go
packages was higher than the version they existed in the archive with
and the updates started a chain reaction requiring upgrading several
other packages.
The p
Is there a particular reason for not wanting to mark this configuration file as
a configuration file? UCF_FORCE_CONFFOLD and UCF_FORCE_CONFFMISS provide the
exact behaviour you described and if used only in non interactive mode the
users would even have a chance to review changes.
Without markin
Systemd provides that functionality itself, internally. We don't want to
use UCF or mark this as a config file. We want to copy the file once on
installation iff it doesn't exist. It is otherwise an 'example' file.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
The other well established method is the one used extensively with
systemd units, where file in /lib/systemd/system can be overridden by a
file with the same name in /etc/systemd/systemd .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
The standard self-descriptive way of doing that is using ucf. Do you
mean openssh-server by SSHD? It uses ucf.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870314
Title:
[needs-packaging] google-g
The way that this file is managed has changed as part of this
replacement, and many customers have automatic updates enabled. We chose
not to mark this file as a config file, as we don't want that dialog to
appear. We only ever copy the file into place if it doesn't already
exist, and after that, i
Thank you for the review. I'm fixing the config file location typo in
the next upload.
Ubuntu's package installation ensures that modified local configuration files
are not overwritten without consent.
Having an old file in /etc/... triggers the following question which is better
than silently i
I have looked at this package on a testing image in GCE. The instance
configs file has been shipped differently in this package vs ours - here
you are shipping it as /etc/defaults/instance_configs.cfg, we ship to
/usr/share/google-guest-agent/instance_configs.cfg
There are two problems with this c
Looks like this has built in Groovy now
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-guest-
agent/20200617.00-0ubuntu1. (Not sure why it wasn't closed automatically
when the bug number was mentioned in the change log)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You receiv
I've updated the packages in the Bileto ticket's PPA and I've also uploaded
them to Groovy. Some of them need Archive Admin approval to show up in
-proposed with all binaries.
My testing of the packages went well on a GCE instance.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
There is an updated set of packages which are close to be ready for uploading
to groovy:
https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/4148
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870314
Title:
[needs-
All the packages split off from gce-compute-image-packages will be
updated together. I'm staging the update here:
https://launchpad.net/~rbalint/+archive/ubuntu/gce-staging/+packages
google-osconfig-agent is still in progress due to required additional updates
in the dependency chain.
The packag
** Tags added: id-5e458d59714e8202f34cf300
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870314
Title:
[needs-packaging] google-guest-agent
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bu
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Balint Reczey (rbalint)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Importance: Wishlist => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870314
Title:
[need
Hi Balint, just checking in with you if you have questions or issues.
Also, I wanted to make sure you had a good understanding of where
everything lives now.
GCE guest agent: https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/guest-agent
* Replaces the python agents and instance setup.
* Package name we are u
*** This is an automated message ***
This bug is tagged needs-packaging which identifies it as a request for
a new package in Ubuntu. As a part of the managing needs-packaging bug
reports specification,
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Specs/NeedsPackagingBugs, all needs-
packaging bug reports have
** Tags added: needs-packaging
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870314
Title:
[needs-packaging] google-guest-agent
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad
20 matches
Mail list logo
