Great news Arthur, I'm glad the issue is solved!
Thanks for the report and testing,
Guilherme
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187
Title:
Bionic ubuntu ethtool doesn't check ring p
Hi Guilherme,
Thanks for the update! I tested and it works!
Cheers,
Arthur
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187
Title:
Bionic ubuntu ethtool doesn't check ring parameters boundari
Hi Arthur, good news - there are currently Bionic and Xenial AMIs with
the fix! I've tried the following AMIs, and they have the fix:
ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20200610 -
ami-025201fa53cf4d031
ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-xenial-16.04-amd64-server-20200610 -
ami-0a0d
Hi Guilherme,
Thanks for your reply.
No need for an exact ETA, but can you give me some sort of feeling, maybe how
often do these amis get released? once a month? 2 months?
Cheers,
Arthur
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
Hi Arthur, I discussed this topic today with the responsible for AMIs on
AWS, and I was then told that new AMIs should be built for testing next
hours. After internal testing, they should get released, I don't have an
ETA.
Cheers,
Guilherme
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Question - when is this fix expected to be released to the official Bionic and
Xenial AMIs in AWS?
Thank!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187
Title:
Bionic ubuntu ethtool doesn't
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187
Title:
Bionic ubuntu ethtool doesn't check ring parameters boundaries
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 4.4.0-184.214
---
linux (4.4.0-184.214) xenial; urgency=medium
* CVE-2020-0543
- SAUCE: x86/cpu: Add a steppings field to struct x86_cpu_id
- SAUCE: x86/cpu: Add 'table' argument to cpu_matches()
- SAUCE: x86/speculation: Add Spe
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 4.15.0-106.107
---
linux (4.15.0-106.107) bionic; urgency=medium
* CVE-2020-0543
- SAUCE: x86/cpu: Add a steppings field to struct x86_cpu_id
- SAUCE: x86/cpu: Add 'table' argument to cpu_matches()
- SAUCE: x86/speculation: Add S
I was able to verify it on AWS using the test procedure on description, in the
following linux-aws proposed kernels:
4.4.0-1108-aws (Xenial / 16.04)
4.15.0-1068-aws (Bionic / 18.04)
Also, I've done a code inspection in generic proposed kernels (4.4.0-180/Xenial
and 4.15.0-102/Bionic) and the pa
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
xenial' to 'verification-done-xenial'. If the problem still exists,
change the tag 'verifica
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
bionic' to 'verification-done-bionic'. If the problem still exists,
change the tag 'verifica
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
SRU submitted to kernel mailing-list: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives
/kernel-team/2020-May/109697.html
Cheers,
Guilherme
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187
Title:
Bionic ubu
** Description changed:
- Upstream linux kernel implemented ring parameter boundaries check in commit:
- 37e2d99b59c4 ("ethtool: Ensure new ring parameters are within bounds during
SRINGPARAM")
+ [Impact]
+ * There's a bad behavior in the ena driver ringparam setting on kernels 4.4
and 4.15, if
Hi Arthur, thanks a lot for the report and for providing a test case and a fix
suggestion - basically you did all the work heheh
I've just built kernels 4.4 (Xenial) and 4.15 (Bionic) with your suggested fix
and indeed it prevented the failure; I'm working on the SRU request, so we can
get that
Hi,
Bumping this ticket up.
Is there still something missing in the ticket that I can provide to make it
workable?
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187
Title:
Bionic ubu
Tried running apport-collect but since my machine has no guy I couldn't
authorize.
Tried running apport-cli --save file.out - this also failed with:
"No pending crash reports. Try --help for more information."
I have no idea how to continue here, and I don't see the point as it is
fairly easy to
This can't be fixed in ethtool, it has to be fixed in the kernel.
** Package changed: ethtool (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187
Title:
Bionic ubuntu e
** Package changed: ubuntu => ethtool (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187
Title:
Bionic ubuntu ethtool doesn't check ring parameters boundaries
To manage notifications ab
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
21 matches
Mail list logo