** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: Eric Desrochers (slashd) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
[Impact]
In Xenial/16.04LTS, one can't generate network interface name from
"phys_port_name" attribute.
"phys_port_name" indicates the interface physical port name within the
NIC.
[Test Case]
Check that udev (systemd-udevd) provides the phys_port_name
** Description changed:
[Impact]
In Xenial/16.04LTS, one can't generate network interface name from
"phys_port_name" attribute.
"phys_port_name" indicates the interface physical port name within the
NIC.
[Test Case]
Check that udev (systemd-udevd) provides the phys_port_name
** Description changed:
[Impact]
In Xenial/16.04LTS, one can't generate network interface name from
"phys_port_name" attribute.
"phys_port_name" indicates the interface physical port name within the
NIC.
[Test Case]
Check that udev (systemd-udevd) provides the phys_port_name
** Description changed:
[Impact]
In Xenial/16.04LTS, one can't generate network interface name from
"phys_port_name" attribute.
"phys_port_name" indicates the interface physical port name within the
NIC.
[Test Case]
Check that udev (systemd-udevd) provides the phys_port_name
https://git.centos.org/rpms/systemd/c/83b94d10951d79445f7975bff835a88261c11a4e?branch=83b94d10951d79445f7975bff835a88261c11a4e
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875927
Title:
add
Centos had to revert the patch in their systemd package via:
commit 83b94d10951d79445f7975bff835a88261c11a4e
SOURCES/0499-Revert-udev-net_id-add-support-for-phys_port_name-at.patch
They workaround (differing from upstream) the regression installing script and
udev rule to add phys_port_name
Right, @ddstreet it's a very good point to validate/verify.
Definitely worth looking at that aspect pre-SRU.
Bionic and late has the fix since release time ... meaning that patch
has never been introduced via SRU yet.
- Eric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I think this would change the device name for existing devices, right?
If so, that doesn't seem appropriate for an SRU, as it could break
existing users that expect their device names to be consistent...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+ In Xenial/16.04LTS, one can't generate network interface name from
"phys_port_name" attribute.
+
+ "phys_port_name" indicates the interface physical port name within the
+ NIC.
+
+ [Test Case]
+
+ Check that udev (systemd-udevd) provides the phys_port_name
** Description changed:
It has been brought to my attention that systemd in Xenial/16.04LTS
doesn't have support for phys_port_name[0] attribute.
The support has been first introduced in systemd version "232" via:
11 matches
Mail list logo
