[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-27 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 5.4.0-42.46 --- linux (5.4.0-42.46) focal; urgency=medium * focal/linux: 5.4.0-42.46 -proposed tracker (LP: #1887069) * linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108 (LP: #1886668) - SAUCE: Revert "netprio_cgroup: Fix

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-27 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 5.3.0-64.58 --- linux (5.3.0-64.58) eoan; urgency=medium * eoan/linux: 5.3.0-64.58 -proposed tracker (LP: #1887088) * linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108 (LP: #1886668) - SAUCE: Revert "netprio_cgroup: Fix

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-23 Thread Matthias Köhne
I was also affected in bionic (linux-image-5.3.0-62-generic), but (since today?) there is an update available: linux-image-5.4.0-42-generic (5.4.0-42.46~18.04.1) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-23 Thread Janåke Rönnblom
I think this is needed in linux-generic-hwe-18.04. We get similar crashes with 5.3.0.62 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886668 Title: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 5.4.0-42.46 --- linux (5.4.0-42.46) focal; urgency=medium * focal/linux: 5.4.0-42.46 -proposed tracker (LP: #1887069) * linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108 (LP: #1886668) - SAUCE: Revert "netprio_cgroup: Fix

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 4.15.0-111.112 --- linux (4.15.0-111.112) bionic; urgency=medium * bionic/linux: 4.15.0-111.112 -proposed tracker (LP: #1886999) * Bionic update: upstream stable patchset 2020-05-07 (LP: #1877461) - SAUCE: mlxsw: Add missmerged

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-13 Thread Sean Groarke
Concur. Previously in bionic 4.15.0-109 I would get this within 5 or 6 hours *max* (often much less) with 4.15.0-111 I'm at about 24 hours so far and no sign. Looks good. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-13 Thread Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
I confirm that I can't reproduce the bug with the reproducer from comment #7 with bionic/linux 4.15.0-111. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-12 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- eoan' to 'verification-done-eoan'. If the problem still exists, change the tag

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-11 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- focal' to 'verification-done-focal'. If the problem still exists, change the tag

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-10 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- bionic' to 'verification-done-bionic'. If the problem still exists, change the tag

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-09 Thread Khaled El Mously
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-09 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
https://launchpad.net/~cascardo/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/11419106 /+listing-archive-extra So, this package on my ppa is built for bionic, but should work on other series too. It has a service that will call a wrapper that will start the reproducer and reboot. The reason for the reboot is

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-09 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886668 Title: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-09 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo (cascardo) Status: Invalid ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-08 Thread Khaled El Mously
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886668 Title: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-08 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Test kernels at https://people.canonical.com/~cascardo/lp1886668/. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886668 Title: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108 To manage

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-08 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
** Description changed: [Impact] On systems using cgroups and sockets extensively, like docker, kubernetes, lxd, libvirt, a crash might happen when using linux 4.15.0-109-generic. [Fix] Revert the patch that disables sk_alloc cgroup refcounting when tasks are added to net_prio

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-08 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Bugs are LP#1886860 and LP#1886859. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886668 Title: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108 To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-08 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
** Description changed: + [Impact] + On systems using cgroups and sockets extensively, like docker, kubernetes, lxd, libvirt, a crash might happen when using linux 4.15.0-109-generic. + + [Fix] + Revert the patch that disables sk_alloc cgroup refcounting when tasks are added to net_prio

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-08 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
This is caused by net_cls and net_prio cgroups disabling cgroup BPF and causing it to stop refcounting when allocating new sockets. Releasing those sockets will cause the refcount to go negative, leading to the potential use-after-free. Though this revert won't prevent the issue from happening as

[Bug 1886668] Re: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108

2020-07-08 Thread Steve Beattie
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886668 Title: linux 4.15.0-109-generic network DoS regression vs -108 To manage